Appsmith vs Supabase
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Appsmith is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 17.6 versus 3.6 for Supabase, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Appsmith if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (17.6 vs 3.6)
- You want a lower entry price ($15 vs $25)
- AI answers describe it more positively (48% vs 18% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
Choose Supabase if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001 or HIPAA (BAA available) coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Appsmith | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 17.6% | 3.6% |
| Change vs last week | up+1.9% | New |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #7 | #27 |
| Share of voice | 4.2% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 23 | 6 |
| Positive in AI answers | 48% | 18% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Appsmith +1.9000000000000021pp · Supabase +3.6pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Appsmith leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Appsmith | Supabase |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best Low-Code & No-Code tools in 2026? | ChatGPT | #19 | #12 |
| Best low-code platform for startups | AI Mode | #7 | #5 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Appsmith | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $15 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Self-hosted, cloud, or managed hosting; air-gapped edition as an add-on | Hosted cloud in AWS regions across the US, EU and Asia Pacific, or self-hosted open source |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA (BAA available) |
| Support | Community support on Discord, Priority email and chat support on Business, 24x7 support with response time SLAs on Enterprise, Dedicated customer solutions engineer on Enterprise | Community support (Free plan), Email support (Pro plan), Priority email support and SLAs (Team plan), 24x7 premium enterprise support and private Slack channel (Enterprise plan) |
| Founded | 2019 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA | Remote-first, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series B · $52M raised | Series D · $1000M raised |
| Best for | Developers and engineering teams building internal apps, dashboards and admin panels | Teams building production applications on Postgres that want auth, storage, realtime and vector search in one backend |
Plans side by side
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Appsmith
- Open-source and free to self-host
- Flexible approach with native JavaScript customization
- Strong fit for internal tools, dashboards and admin panels
- Favored by developers and technical teams
- Transparent, predictable published pricing
Supabase
- Integrates smoothly with Firebase and Supabase
- Zero extra infrastructure when already running Postgres via Supabase
- Pay nothing extra for pgvector on an existing database
- Minimal operational overhead for existing Postgres clusters
- Offers vector search via pgvector, with customers paying only for the database
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Appsmith vs Supabase”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/appsmith-vs-supabase, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.