Skip to content
SlateIndex
AsanaWork & Project Management for Human-Agent Teams
vs
GitHubThe home of software development
Comparison · Project Management · weekly run Nov 3

Asana vs GitHub

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Asana is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 60.9 versus 10.2 for GitHub, and ranks ahead in 63% of the answers that name both.

Choose Asana if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (60.9 vs 10.2)
  • You need FedRAMP Moderate (Asana Gov) coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
  • Strong for cross-functional structured execution and milestone tracking

Choose GitHub if…

  • You want a lower entry price ($4 vs $10.99)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (48% vs 42% positive)
  • You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
  • You need SOC 1 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or CSA STAR Level 2 or PCI DSS or FedRAMP Tailored ATO coverage

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Asana GitHub
Visibility score60.9%10.2%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Project Management#1#10
Share of voice11.7%2.6%
Mentions this run6413
Positive in AI answers42%48%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Asana 61%

Asana 0pp · GitHub 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Asana leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
64.8%
4.1%
AI Mode
54.8%
20.7%
Perplexity
63%
5.9%
AsanaGitHub

Head to head in AI answers

8 engine answers name both brands

5Asana ranked higher
3GitHub ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionAsanaGitHub
Pricing modelPer seatPer seat
Entry priceFree; paid from $10.99 per seat / moFree; paid from $4 per seat / mo
Free planYesYes
DeploymentCloudCloud service (GitHub.com and GitHub Enterprise Cloud) and self-hosted GitHub Enterprise Server
Integrations100+—
ComplianceSOC 2 Type 2, FedRAMP Moderate (Asana Gov)SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, CSA STAR Level 2, PCI DSS, FedRAMP Tailored ATO
SupportHelp Center, Community, Asana Academy, Customer SuccessCommunity support (Free plan), Web-based support (Team plan), Premium support with 24/7 web and phone support and a 30-minute SLA on urgent tickets (Enterprise)
Founded20082008
HeadquartersSan Francisco, California, United StatesSan Francisco, California
Employees1,001–5,000501–1,000
FundingSeries ERound led by Sequoia Capital · $350M raised
Best forIndividuals and teams from small groups up to large organizations scaling cross-functional work across departments.Development teams, from individuals to enterprises, that build, review, and ship software on one platform.

Plans side by side

Asana

Personal$0free forever
Starter$10.99per user per month, billed annually
Advanced$24.99per user per month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Asana pricing

GitHub

Free$0month
Team$4user / month
Enterprise$21user / month
GitHub pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Asana

  • Strong for cross-functional structured execution and milestone tracking
  • Easy to adopt and use, with clean design
  • Goal tracking and cross-team accountability
  • Strongest general-purpose project management choice
  • Asana Intelligence summarises status and spots bottlenecks; AI agents for coordination

    GitHub

    • Most widely adopted CI/CD tool today
    • Native integration with GitHub repositories and pull requests
    • Transparent pricing with a generous free tier
    • Best default for teams already using GitHub
    • High user satisfaction and review scores

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Asana vs GitHub”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/asana-vs-github, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.