AsanaWork & Project Management for Human-Agent Teams
vs
JiraPlan, track, and release software
Comparison · Project Management · weekly run Nov 3
Asana vs Jira
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Asana is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 60.9 versus 36.9 for Jira, and ranks ahead in 66% of the answers that name both.
Choose Asana if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (60.9 vs 36.9)
- AI answers describe it more positively (42% vs 35% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or FedRAMP Moderate (Asana Gov) coverage
- Strong for cross-functional structured execution and milestone tracking
Choose Jira if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 or PCI DSS or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27018 coverage
- Best fit for software and agile development teams
- Largest market share among project management tools
- Robust Scrum and Kanban support with backlogs, boards, and reporting
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Asana | Jira |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 60.9% | 36.9% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Project Management | #1 | #4 |
| Share of voice | 11.7% | 8.9% |
| Mentions this run | 64 | 49 |
| Positive in AI answers | 42% | 35% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Asana 0pp · Jira 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Asana leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AsanaJira
Head to head in AI answers
47 engine answers name both brands
31Asana ranked higher
16Jira ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Asana | Jira |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $10.99 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud and Data Center |
| Integrations | 100+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, FedRAMP Moderate (Asana Gov) | SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, PCI DSS, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27018 |
| Support | Help Center, Community, Asana Academy, Customer Success | — |
| Founded | 2008 | — |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, United States | Sydney, Australia |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | — |
| Funding | Series E | IPO |
| Best for | Individuals and teams from small groups up to large organizations scaling cross-functional work across departments. | — |
Plans side by side
Asana
Personal$0free forever
Starter$10.99per user per month, billed annually
Advanced$24.99per user per month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Jira
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Asana
- Strong for cross-functional structured execution and milestone tracking
- Easy to adopt and use, with clean design
- Goal tracking and cross-team accountability
- Strongest general-purpose project management choice
- Asana Intelligence summarises status and spots bottlenecks; AI agents for coordination
Jira
- Best fit for software and agile development teams
- Largest market share among project management tools
- Robust Scrum and Kanban support with backlogs, boards, and reporting
- Free plan for up to 10 users
- Integrates with developer tools such as GitHub and code workflows
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Asana vs Jira”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/asana-vs-jira-align, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.