AsanaWork & Project Management for Human-Agent Teams
vs
ShortcutFast project management for software teams and their agents
Comparison · Project Management · weekly run Nov 3
Asana vs Shortcut
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Asana is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 60.9 versus 0.3 for Shortcut, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Asana if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (60.9 vs 0.3)
- AI answers describe it more positively (42% vs 0% positive)
- You need FedRAMP Moderate (Asana Gov) coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
Choose Shortcut if…
- You want a lower entry price ($8.5 vs $10.99)
- You need GDPR or HIPAA (BAA on Business and Enterprise plans) coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Asana | Shortcut |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 60.9% | 0.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Project Management | #1 | #43 |
| Share of voice | 11.7% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 64 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 42% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Asana 0pp · Shortcut 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Asana leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AsanaShortcut
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
1Asana ranked higher
0Shortcut ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Asana | Shortcut |
|---|---|---|---|
| Top project management tool options for B2B SaaS companies | ChatGPT | #3 | #8 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Asana | Shortcut |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $10.99 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $8.5 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud-based |
| Integrations | 100+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, FedRAMP Moderate (Asana Gov) | SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, HIPAA (BAA on Business and Enterprise plans) |
| Support | Help Center, Community, Asana Academy, Customer Success | Help Center, Community Slack channel, Email support@shortcut.com, Premier support SLAs on Enterprise plan |
| Founded | 2008 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, United States | New York, NY, United States |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series E | Seed rounds · $39M raised |
| Best for | Individuals and teams from small groups up to large organizations scaling cross-functional work across departments. | Software teams, including product and engineering teams, that want lightweight project management with issue tracking. |
Plans side by side
Asana
Personal$0free forever
Starter$10.99per user per month, billed annually
Advanced$24.99per user per month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Shortcut
Free Plan$0per user/month
Team Plan$8.5per user/month
Business Plan$12per user/month
Enterprise PlanCustom
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Asana
- Strong for cross-functional structured execution and milestone tracking
- Easy to adopt and use, with clean design
- Goal tracking and cross-team accountability
- Strongest general-purpose project management choice
- Asana Intelligence summarises status and spots bottlenecks; AI agents for coordination
Shortcut
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Asana vs Shortcut”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/asana-vs-shortcut, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.