Atlassian ConfluenceKnowledge Management
vs
CeloxisEnterprise project and portfolio management in one execution platform.
Comparison · Project Management · weekly run Nov 3
Atlassian Confluence vs Celoxis
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Celoxis is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 4.6 versus 3.1 for Atlassian Confluence.
Choose Atlassian Confluence if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (42% vs 25% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 or SOC 3 or PCI DSS or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27018 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
Choose Celoxis if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (4.6 vs 3.1)
- You need ISO 27001 or AICPA SOC 2 Type 2 or EU GDPR or UK GDPR coverage
- Portfolio planning and scenario analysis
- Strong ratings in some comparison research
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Atlassian Confluence | Celoxis |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.1% | 4.6% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Project Management | #25 | #17 |
| Share of voice | 1% | 1.5% |
| Mentions this run | 5 | 9 |
| Positive in AI answers | 42% | 25% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Atlassian Confluence 0pp · Celoxis 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Celoxis leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Atlassian ConfluenceCeloxis
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Atlassian Confluence ranked higher
0Celoxis ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Atlassian Confluence | Celoxis |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | $10 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS, hosted by Atlassian) and self-hosted Data Center. Confluence Server reached end of support on 15 February 2024. | Cloud or on-premise |
| Integrations | — | 400+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2, SOC 3, PCI DSS, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27018 | ISO 27001, AICPA SOC 2 Type 2, EU GDPR, UK GDPR |
| Support | — | 24x5 support with real people, Standard, Premium and VIP support tiers by plan, Dedicated account manager through rollout |
| Founded | — | 2001 |
| Headquarters | Sydney, Australia | Pune, India |
| Employees | 5,000+ | 51–200 |
| Funding | Grant | — |
| Best for | — | PMOs and project-driven teams that need to manage portfolios, resources, budgets and risks together. |
Plans side by side
Atlassian Confluence
Pricing not available.
Celoxis
Core$10per Standard user per month, billed annually
Essentials$25per Standard user per month, billed annually
Professional$35per Standard user per month, billed annually
Business$45per Standard user per month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Atlassian Confluence
- Industry standard for large-scale enterprise documentation and wikis
- Deep integration with Jira and the Atlassian ecosystem
- Strong fit for engineering and technical teams
- Free plan supports up to 10 users
- Savings of up to 17% when billed annually
Celoxis
- Portfolio planning and scenario analysis
- Strong ratings in some comparison research
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Atlassian Confluence vs Celoxis”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/atlassian-confluence-vs-celoxis, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.