Augment Code vs Codex
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Codex is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 20.9 versus 2.2 for Augment Code, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Augment Code if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 64% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO/IEC 42001 coverage
- Suited to very large or legacy repositories
- Named as a contender in the field
Choose Codex if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (20.9 vs 2.2)
- Strong for autonomous coding tasks
- Frequently included in top AI coding shortlists
- Enterprise-scale engineering adoption
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Augment Code | Codex |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.2% | 20.9% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #20 | #4 |
| Share of voice | 0.8% | 5.4% |
| Mentions this run | 4 | 28 |
| Positive in AI answers | 100% | 64% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Augment Code 0pp · Codex 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Codex leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Augment Code | Codex |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which AI coding assistant vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #11 | #3 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Augment Code | Codex |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | $20 / mo | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | Managed cloud sandboxes, your own machines, or pools of both | Cloud-hosted agent, with local CLI, IDE extension and desktop app surfaces. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 42001 | — |
| Support | Community support and tickets via support portal (Standard, Business), Dedicated support with full SLA (Enterprise) | — |
| Founded | 2022 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | Palo Alto, California, United States | — |
| Employees | 51–200 | — |
| Funding | Series B · $252M raised | — |
| Best for | Enterprises and engineering organizations running agent workflows across the software development lifecycle, from startups to the Fortune 500 | Software engineers who want an AI agent to handle coding tasks such as writing code and fixing bugs. |
Plans side by side
Augment Code
Codex
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Augment Code
- Suited to very large or legacy repositories
- Named as a contender in the field
Codex
- Strong for autonomous coding tasks
- Frequently included in top AI coding shortlists
- Enterprise-scale engineering adoption
- Deterministic multi-step task execution for OpenAI-first teams
- Delegated engineering tasks, code review, and cloud or parallel agent workflows
- Appears less consistently in enterprise analyst lists
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Augment Code vs Codex”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/augment-code-vs-codex, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.