Skip to content
SlateIndex
Augment CodeAgentic software development at organizational scale
vs
JetBrains AI AssistantProfessional AI Coding. Better Results.
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3

Augment Code vs JetBrains AI Assistant

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

JetBrains AI Assistant is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 6.2 versus 2.2 for Augment Code.

Choose Augment Code if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 33% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO/IEC 42001 coverage
  • Suited to very large or legacy repositories
  • Named as a contender in the field

Choose JetBrains AI Assistant if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (6.2 vs 2.2)
  • You need SOC 2 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
  • natural choice for teams standardized on JetBrains IDEs

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Augment Code JetBrains AI Assistant
Visibility score2.2%6.2%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in AI Coding Assistants#20#15
Share of voice0.8%2.2%
Mentions this run412
Positive in AI answers100%33%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Augment Code 2%

Augment Code 0pp · JetBrains AI Assistant 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

JetBrains AI Assistant leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0.9%
12.2%
AI Mode
0%
0%
Perplexity
5.7%
6.5%
Augment CodeJetBrains AI Assistant

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0Augment Code ranked higher
0JetBrains AI Assistant ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionAugment CodeJetBrains AI Assistant
Pricing modelFlat tiers—
Entry price$20 / mo—
Free planNo—
DeploymentManaged cloud sandboxes, your own machines, or pools of bothPlugin inside JetBrains IDEs; works only within JetBrains IDEs
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 42001SOC 2
SupportCommunity support and tickets via support portal (Standard, Business), Dedicated support with full SLA (Enterprise)Contact support form, Enterprise-grade support
Founded20222000
HeadquartersPalo Alto, California, United StatesAmsterdam, Netherlands
Employees51–2001,001–5,000
FundingSeries B · $252M raisedIncubator/accelerator round (Leading European Tech Scaleups)
Best forEnterprises and engineering organizations running agent workflows across the software development lifecycle, from startups to the Fortune 500Development teams and businesses that want AI coding help inside JetBrains IDEs

Plans side by side

Augment Code

Standard$20month flat, no per-seat charge
Business$100month flat, no per-seat charge
EnterpriseCustomcustom
Augment Code pricing

JetBrains AI Assistant

Pricing not available.

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Augment Code

  • Suited to very large or legacy repositories
  • Named as a contender in the field

    JetBrains AI Assistant

    • natural choice for teams standardized on JetBrains IDEs
    • listed among the strongest AI coding platforms
    • limited trial available to eligible users

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Augment Code vs JetBrains AI Assistant”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/augment-code-vs-jetbrains-ai-assistant, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.