Augment Code vs Kilo Code
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Kilo Code is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 5.3 versus 2.2 for Augment Code, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Augment Code if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO/IEC 42001 coverage
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Suited to very large or legacy repositories
- Named as a contender in the field
Choose Kilo Code if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.3 vs 2.2)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Augment Code | Kilo Code |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.2% | 5.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #20 | #17 |
| Share of voice | 0.8% | 1.1% |
| Mentions this run | 4 | 6 |
| Positive in AI answers | 100% | 100% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Augment Code 0pp · Kilo Code 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Kilo Code leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Augment Code | Kilo Code |
|---|---|---|---|
| How do I choose an AI coding assistant for a mid-market team? | Perplexity | #6 | #4 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Augment Code | Kilo Code |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | $20 / mo | Free; paid from $15 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Deployment | Managed cloud sandboxes, your own machines, or pools of both | IDE, CLI and cloud; local models supported; the open-source code can be self-hosted |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 42001 | — |
| Support | Community support and tickets via support portal (Standard, Business), Dedicated support with full SLA (Enterprise) | Community support on the Individual plan, Priority support on the Teams plan, Dedicated support channels and SLA commitments on the Enterprise plan |
| Founded | 2022 | — |
| Headquarters | Palo Alto, California, United States | — |
| Employees | 51–200 | — |
| Funding | Series B · $252M raised | Seed · $8M raised |
| Best for | Enterprises and engineering organizations running agent workflows across the software development lifecycle, from startups to the Fortune 500 | Developers and teams who want an open-source AI coding agent that works with their own model keys or local models across IDE, CLI and cloud. |
Plans side by side
Augment Code
Kilo Code
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Augment Code
- Suited to very large or legacy repositories
- Named as a contender in the field
Kilo Code
- Useful AI coding agent inside the IDE
- Low subscription costs and no vendor lock-in
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Augment Code vs Kilo Code”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/augment-code-vs-kilo-code, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.