Augment CodeAgentic software development at organizational scale
vs
TabbyOpensource, self-hosted AI coding assistant
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3
Augment Code vs Tabby
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Augment Code is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 2.2 versus 0.3 for Tabby.
Choose Augment Code if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.2 vs 0.3)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO/IEC 42001 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
Choose Tabby if…
- You want a free plan to start
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- privacy and self-hosting
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Augment Code | Tabby |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.2% | 0.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #20 | #36 |
| Share of voice | 0.8% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 4 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 100% | 100% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Augment Code 0pp · Tabby 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Augment Code leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Augment CodeTabby
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Augment Code ranked higher
0Tabby ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Augment Code | Tabby |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | $20 / mo | Free; paid from $19 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Deployment | Managed cloud sandboxes, your own machines, or pools of both | Self-hosted on-premises or in the cloud, with no external DBMS or cloud services required |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 42001 | — |
| Support | Community support and tickets via support portal (Standard, Business), Dedicated support with full SLA (Enterprise) | Community Slack, Email support, Dedicated Slack channel |
| Founded | 2022 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Palo Alto, California, United States | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Series B · $252M raised | Seed · $7M raised |
| Best for | Enterprises and engineering organizations running agent workflows across the software development lifecycle, from startups to the Fortune 500 | Developers and teams who want a self-hosted, open-source alternative to GitHub Copilot and need to keep control of their code and infrastructure. |
Plans side by side
Augment Code
Standard$20month flat, no per-seat charge
Business$100month flat, no per-seat charge
EnterpriseCustomcustom
Tabby
Community$0per month, free open source
Team$19per seat per month
EnterpriseCustomcustom, billed annually
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Augment Code
- Suited to very large or legacy repositories
- Named as a contender in the field
Tabby
- privacy and self-hosting
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Augment Code vs Tabby”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/augment-code-vs-tabby, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.