AuthentikOpen source, self-hosted identity provider for unified authentication.
vs
AWSVisual low-code tool for building AWS-backed apps from Figma designs
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3
Authentik vs AWS
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
AWS is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 14.1 versus 2.7 for Authentik.
Choose Authentik if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 16% positive)
- You need OpenID Certified coverage
- fully open-source, self-hosted IAM platform
- modern UI
Choose AWS if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (14.1 vs 2.7)
- You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 or SOC 3 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or ISO 27701 or PCI DSS Level 1 or FedRAMP or DoD SRG or ISO 9001 or ISO 27001 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
- Core federation and multi-account management included at no extra charge
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Authentik | AWS |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.7% | 14.1% |
| Change vs last week | up+1.7% | New |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #24 | #9 |
| Share of voice | 0.6% | 5.1% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 15 |
| Positive in AI answers | 67% | 16% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Authentik +1.0000000000000002pp · AWS +14.1pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
AWS leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AuthentikAWS
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Authentik ranked higher
0AWS ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Authentik | AWS |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $5 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Self-hosted (Kubernetes, Terraform, Docker Compose, AWS CloudFormation); no hosted version offered | — |
| Compliance | OpenID Certified | SOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 27701, PCI DSS Level 1, FedRAMP, DoD SRG, ISO 9001, ISO 27001 |
| Support | Community Discord, GitHub community support, Ticket-based support (Enterprise over $1k), Dedicated support with SLAs (Enterprise Plus) | — |
| Founded | 2018 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | — | Seattle, Washington |
| Employees | 1–10 | 5,000+ |
| Funding | Later-stage VC · $2M raised | — |
| Best for | Organizations that want to self-host their identity provider and keep control of their identity data, from homelabs to enterprises with thousands of users. | — |
Plans side by side
Authentik
Open Source$0free
Enterprise$5user / month, billed annually
Enterprise Plus$20,000year (starting at)
AWS
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Authentik
- fully open-source, self-hosted IAM platform
- modern UI
- easy to administer
- affordable, reliable, secure IAM platform for business use
- highly flexible with built-in MFA and proxy outposts
- you must manage hosting, updates, backups, and security yourself
AWS
- Core federation and multi-account management included at no extra charge
- Enterprise-grade reliability and uptime on AWS infrastructure
- Pay-as-you-go, usage-based pricing
- Deep integration with the AWS ecosystem and AI tools
- Recognised by analysts such as Gartner and ISG
- Requires strong AWS engineering or technical expertise
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Authentik vs AWS”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/authentik-vs-aws, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.