Authentik vs Microsoft Entra ID
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Microsoft Entra ID is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 66 versus 2.7 for Authentik, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.
Choose Authentik if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 45% positive)
- You need OpenID Certified coverage
- fully open-source, self-hosted IAM platform
- modern UI
Choose Microsoft Entra ID if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (66 vs 2.7)
- Native integration with Microsoft 365 and Azure ecosystems
- Cost-effective fit for organizations already paying for Microsoft 365
- Strong workforce IAM with SSO, MFA and passwordless access
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Authentik | Microsoft Entra ID |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.7% | 66% |
| Change vs last week | up+1.7% | up+5.2% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #24 | #1 |
| Share of voice | 0.6% | 12.9% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 40 |
| Positive in AI answers | 67% | 45% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Authentik +1.0000000000000002pp · Microsoft Entra ID +5.100000000000001pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Microsoft Entra ID leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
4 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Authentik | Microsoft Entra ID |
|---|---|---|---|
| Most affordable identity and access management platform that is still reliable | ChatGPT | #3 | #2 |
| Is there a free identity and access management platform for small teams? | ChatGPT | #1 | #4 |
| Is there a free identity and access management platform for small teams? | AI Mode | #1 | #4 |
| Is there a free identity and access management platform for small teams? | Perplexity | #5 | #2 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Authentik | Microsoft Entra ID |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $5 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Self-hosted (Kubernetes, Terraform, Docker Compose, AWS CloudFormation); no hosted version offered | Cloud |
| Compliance | OpenID Certified | — |
| Support | Community Discord, GitHub community support, Ticket-based support (Enterprise over $1k), Dedicated support with SLAs (Enterprise Plus) | — |
| Founded | 2018 | 2008 |
| Employees | 1–10 | — |
| Funding | Later-stage VC · $2M raised | — |
| Best for | Organizations that want to self-host their identity provider and keep control of their identity data, from homelabs to enterprises with thousands of users. | — |
Plans side by side
Authentik
Microsoft Entra ID
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Authentik
- fully open-source, self-hosted IAM platform
- modern UI
- easy to administer
- affordable, reliable, secure IAM platform for business use
- highly flexible with built-in MFA and proxy outposts
- you must manage hosting, updates, backups, and security yourself
Microsoft Entra ID
- Native integration with Microsoft 365 and Azure ecosystems
- Cost-effective fit for organizations already paying for Microsoft 365
- Strong workforce IAM with SSO, MFA and passwordless access
- Top-ranked and recognised as a Leader among IAM providers
- Strong for enterprise identity governance and hybrid environments
- Advanced add-ons carry extra yearly paid subscription costs
- Advanced features such as Conditional Access require paid tiers
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Authentik vs Microsoft Entra ID”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/authentik-vs-microsoft-entra-id, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.