Authentik vs One Identity
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
One Identity is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 5.2 versus 2.7 for Authentik.
Choose Authentik if…
- You need OpenID Certified coverage
- fully open-source, self-hosted IAM platform
- modern UI
- easy to administer
Choose One Identity if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.2 vs 2.7)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2013 certified ISMS for SaaS offerings or NIAP Common Criteria certification for Identity Manager 8.1 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Authentik | One Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.7% | 5.2% |
| Change vs last week | up+1.7% | New |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #24 | #16 |
| Share of voice | 0.6% | 2.4% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 8 |
| Positive in AI answers | 67% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Authentik +1.0000000000000002pp · One Identity +5.2pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
One Identity leads on 1 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Authentik | One Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $5 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Self-hosted (Kubernetes, Terraform, Docker Compose, AWS CloudFormation); no hosted version offered | SaaS (Identity Manager On Demand); on-premises or hybrid deployment not confirmed |
| Compliance | OpenID Certified | ISO/IEC 27001:2013 certified ISMS for SaaS offerings, NIAP Common Criteria certification for Identity Manager 8.1 |
| Support | Community Discord, GitHub community support, Ticket-based support (Enterprise over $1k), Dedicated support with SLAs (Enterprise Plus) | — |
| Founded | 2018 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | — | Aliso Viejo, California; global HQ moving to Cork, Ireland, as announced June 2026 |
| Employees | 1–10 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Later-stage VC · $2M raised | — |
| Best for | Organizations that want to self-host their identity provider and keep control of their identity data, from homelabs to enterprises with thousands of users. | — |
Plans side by side
Authentik
One Identity
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Authentik
- fully open-source, self-hosted IAM platform
- modern UI
- easy to administer
- affordable, reliable, secure IAM platform for business use
- highly flexible with built-in MFA and proxy outposts
- you must manage hosting, updates, backups, and security yourself
One Identity
- Cost-effective alternative to Okta for streamlined workforce identity
- Robust app catalog and developer-friendly provisioning
- Single sign-on reducing password sprawl and sign-in friction
- Privileged access capabilities alongside identity management
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Authentik vs One Identity”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/authentik-vs-one-identity, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.