AuthentikOpen source, self-hosted identity provider for unified authentication.
vs
RipplingHR, IT, and Finance apps on a unified data platform
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3
Authentik vs Rippling
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Rippling is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 3 versus 2.7 for Authentik.
Choose Authentik if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 55% positive)
- You need OpenID Certified coverage
- fully open-source, self-hosted IAM platform
- modern UI
Choose Rippling if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3 vs 2.7)
- You need SOC 1 Type II or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 or CSA STAR Level 2 or ISO 27001 or ISO 27018 or ISO 42001 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
- Unified HR, IT, and payroll in one automated system
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Authentik | Rippling |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.7% | 3% |
| Change vs last week | up+1.7% | down−0.6% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #24 | #23 |
| Share of voice | 0.6% | 1% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 67% | 55% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Authentik +1.0000000000000002pp · Rippling 0pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Rippling leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AuthentikRippling
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Authentik ranked higher
0Rippling ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Authentik | Rippling |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $5 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Self-hosted (Kubernetes, Terraform, Docker Compose, AWS CloudFormation); no hosted version offered | Cloud |
| Integrations | — | 600+ |
| Compliance | OpenID Certified | SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, CSA STAR Level 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27018, ISO 42001 |
| Support | Community Discord, GitHub community support, Ticket-based support (Enterprise over $1k), Dedicated support with SLAs (Enterprise Plus) | Contact page, AI assistant |
| Founded | 2018 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | — | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | 1–10 | 5,000+ |
| Funding | Later-stage VC · $2M raised | Series G · $1850M raised |
| Best for | Organizations that want to self-host their identity provider and keep control of their identity data, from homelabs to enterprises with thousands of users. | Companies wanting identity, device and access management tied directly to HR and payroll data |
Plans side by side
Authentik
Open Source$0free
Enterprise$5user / month, billed annually
Enterprise Plus$20,000year (starting at)
Rippling
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Authentik
- fully open-source, self-hosted IAM platform
- modern UI
- easy to administer
- affordable, reliable, secure IAM platform for business use
- highly flexible with built-in MFA and proxy outposts
- you must manage hosting, updates, backups, and security yourself
Rippling
- Unified HR, IT, and payroll in one automated system
- Strong user ratings from reviewers and analysts
- Recruiting tightly integrated with HR and payroll
- Ease of use and intuitive interface
- Expense management connected to HR and payroll
- Mandatory annual contracts with undisclosed discounts
- Custom quotes make pricing hard to compare
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Authentik vs Rippling”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/authentik-vs-rippling, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.