AuthentikOpen source, self-hosted identity provider for unified authentication.
vs
Transmit SecurityCustomer identity and access management with fraud prevention in one platform
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3
Authentik vs Transmit Security
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Authentik is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 2.7 versus 0.7 for Transmit Security.
Choose Authentik if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.7 vs 0.7)
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 50% positive)
- You need OpenID Certified coverage
Choose Transmit Security if…
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Innovative player focused on passwordless authentication
- Risk-based fraud prevention capabilities
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Authentik | Transmit Security |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.7% | 0.7% |
| Change vs last week | up+1.7% | up+0.1% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #24 | #33 |
| Share of voice | 0.6% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 67% | 50% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Authentik +1.0000000000000002pp · Transmit Security 0pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Authentik leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AuthentikTransmit Security
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Authentik ranked higher
0Transmit Security ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Authentik | Transmit Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $5 per seat / mo | $50,000 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment | Self-hosted (Kubernetes, Terraform, Docker Compose, AWS CloudFormation); no hosted version offered | SaaS |
| Compliance | OpenID Certified | — |
| Support | Community Discord, GitHub community support, Ticket-based support (Enterprise over $1k), Dedicated support with SLAs (Enterprise Plus) | Enterprise SLA with premium support |
| Founded | 2018 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | — | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Employees | 1–10 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Later-stage VC · $2M raised | Series A · $543M raised |
| Best for | Organizations that want to self-host their identity provider and keep control of their identity data, from homelabs to enterprises with thousands of users. | Large enterprises such as banks and insurers needing combined customer identity and fraud prevention |
Plans side by side
Authentik
Open Source$0free
Enterprise$5user / month, billed annually
Enterprise Plus$20,000year (starting at)
Transmit Security
Full Mosaic Platform$200,000year for 100K Monthly Active Users (starting at)
Mosaic for Identity$100,000year for 100K Monthly Active Users (starting at)
Mosaic for Identity Fraud and Threat Detection and Response$100,000year for 10M Logins (starting at)
Mosaic for Identity Verification$50,000year for 100K ID Checks (starting at)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Authentik
- fully open-source, self-hosted IAM platform
- modern UI
- easy to administer
- affordable, reliable, secure IAM platform for business use
- highly flexible with built-in MFA and proxy outposts
- you must manage hosting, updates, backups, and security yourself
Transmit Security
- Innovative player focused on passwordless authentication
- Risk-based fraud prevention capabilities
- Modern platform for customer-facing identity experiences
- Noted by Gartner for specialized fraud prevention and CIAM architectures
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Authentik vs Transmit Security”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/authentik-vs-transmit-security, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.