Skip to content
SlateIndex
AWSVisual low-code tool for building AWS-backed apps from Figma designs
vs
OmadaA Leader In Identity Governance and Administration
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3

AWS vs Omada

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

AWS is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 14.1 versus 0.6 for Omada, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose AWS if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (14.1 vs 0.6)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (16% vs 0% positive)
  • You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or ISO 27701 or PCI DSS Level 1 or FedRAMP or DoD SRG or ISO 9001 or ISO 27001 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)

Choose Omada if…

  • You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
  • You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
  • Recommended as a dedicated IGA product for heavy audit, complex role, ERP, or on-premises needs
  • Named among IGA leaders in KuppingerCole 2024 Leadership Compass

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric AWS Omada
Visibility score14.1%0.6%
Change vs last weekNewup+0.6%
Rank in Identity & Access Management#9#34
Share of voice5.1%0.3%
Mentions this run151
Positive in AI answers16%0%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3AWS 14%

AWS +14.1pp · Omada 0pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

AWS leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
16.8%
2.3%
AI Mode
22%
0%
Perplexity
6.1%
1.1%
AWSOmada

Head to head in AI answers

1 engine answers name both brands

1AWS ranked higher
0Omada ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionAWSOmada
Deployment—SaaS on Microsoft Azure (EU or US region), private tenant, or on-premises
ComplianceSOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 27701, PCI DSS Level 1, FedRAMP, DoD SRG, ISO 9001, ISO 27001ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3
Support—Customer Success Team, Service Desk, ITSM system access, Professional services
Founded20212000
HeadquartersSeattle, WashingtonCopenhagen, Denmark
Employees5,000+201–500
Funding—Majority investment (GRO and Kirk Kapital)
Best for—Regulated enterprises and government organizations that need identity governance and administration

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

AWS

  • Core federation and multi-account management included at no extra charge
  • Enterprise-grade reliability and uptime on AWS infrastructure
  • Pay-as-you-go, usage-based pricing
  • Deep integration with the AWS ecosystem and AI tools
  • Recognised by analysts such as Gartner and ISG
  • Requires strong AWS engineering or technical expertise

Omada

  • Recommended as a dedicated IGA product for heavy audit, complex role, ERP, or on-premises needs
  • Named among IGA leaders in KuppingerCole 2024 Leadership Compass

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “AWS vs Omada”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/aws-vs-omada, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.