Okta vs Omada
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Okta is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 56.9 versus 0.6 for Omada, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Okta if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (56.9 vs 0.6)
- AI answers describe it more positively (39% vs 0% positive)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or SOC 2 Type II or FedRAMP High or FedRAMP Moderate or FIPS 140-2 or DoD Impact Level 4 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
Choose Omada if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 3 coverage
- Recommended as a dedicated IGA product for heavy audit, complex role, ERP, or on-premises needs
- Named among IGA leaders in KuppingerCole 2024 Leadership Compass
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Okta | Omada |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 56.9% | 0.6% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.9% | up+0.6% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #2 | #34 |
| Share of voice | 12.2% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 38 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 39% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Okta −3.3000000000000043pp · Omada 0pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Okta leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Okta | Omada |
|---|---|---|---|
| How do I choose a identity and access management platform for a mid-market team? | Perplexity | #2 | #7 |
| What should a identity and access management platform integrate with? | ChatGPT | #5 | #9 |
| Which Identity & Access Management vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #1 | #9 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Okta | Omada |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $6 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No · 30-day trial | — |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | SaaS on Microsoft Azure (EU or US region), private tenant, or on-premises |
| Integrations | 8000+ | — |
| Compliance | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP High, FedRAMP Moderate, FIPS 140-2, DoD Impact Level 4 | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3 |
| Support | Online support (24x5), Knowledge base, Community forum, Premier Success Plans | Customer Success Team, Service Desk, ITSM system access, Professional services |
| Founded | 2009 | 2000 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, United States | Copenhagen, Denmark |
| Employees | 5,000+ | 201–500 |
| Funding | IPO | Majority investment (GRO and Kirk Kapital) |
| Best for | Organizations that need to secure workforce, customer, partner and AI agent identities from one cloud identity platform. | Regulated enterprises and government organizations that need identity governance and administration |
Plans side by side
Okta
Omada
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Okta
- Market-leading IAM platform
- Independent, cloud-native identity platform
- Broad SaaS integrations with SSO and MFA
- Top overall enterprise IAM recommendation
- Strong security effectiveness
Omada
- Recommended as a dedicated IGA product for heavy audit, complex role, ERP, or on-premises needs
- Named among IGA leaders in KuppingerCole 2024 Leadership Compass
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Okta vs Omada”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/okta-vs-omada, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.