Skip to content
SlateIndex
BufferSocial media management for everyone
vs
LoomlyYour Easy-To-Use Social Media Management Platform
Comparison · Social Media Management · weekly run Nov 2

Buffer vs Loomly

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Buffer is the stronger AI pick in Social Media Management: it has a visibility score of 57.6 versus 4.1 for Loomly, and ranks ahead in 56% of the answers that name both.

Choose Buffer if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (57.6 vs 4.1)
  • You want a free plan to start
  • AI answers describe it more positively (58% vs 33% positive)
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)

Choose Loomly if…

  • Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
  • Free trial with full feature access and no credit card required
  • Best for visual-first, collaborative startups
  • Suited to approval-heavy content review workflows

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric Buffer Loomly
Visibility score57.6%4.1%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Social Media Management#1#20
Share of voice11.4%1.6%
Mentions this run639
Positive in AI answers58%33%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Buffer 58%

Buffer 0pp · Loomly 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Buffer leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
56.1%
1.9%
AI Mode
58%
5.6%
Perplexity
58.7%
4.8%
BufferLoomly

Head to head in AI answers

9 engine answers name both brands

5Buffer ranked higher
4Loomly ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionBufferLoomly
Pricing modelPer seatFlat tiers
Entry priceFree; paid from $5 per seat / mo$65 / mo
Free planYesNo
DeploymentCloud-based (SaaS)Hosted cloud service on AWS
SupportHelp Center, Email support, Discord community, Human support team across time zonesChat with the team, FAQ section, Priority support on the Enterprise plan
Founded20102015
HeadquartersSan Francisco, California, USANew York, NY, United States
Employees51–20011–50
FundingSeries A · $4M raisedRound
Best forCreators, brands and agencies that post across many social channels and want flexible per-channel pricingBrands, agencies, freelancers, creators and small businesses that want one tool to plan, publish and engage on social media.

Plans side by side

Buffer

Free$0month, up to 3 channels
Essentials$5channel/month ($60/channel billed yearly)
Team$10channel/month ($120/channel billed yearly)
Buffer pricing

Loomly

Starter$65month, billed monthly ($49/month billed yearly)
Beyond$332month, billed monthly ($249/month billed yearly)
EnterpriseCustomcustom
Loomly pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Buffer

  • simple, user-friendly scheduling and publishing
  • affordable, cost-effective paid plans
  • generous free plan
  • transparent, clear pricing
  • popular with solo creators, small businesses and startups
  • free plan limited to 3 channels and 10 posts per channel, solo use only
  • limited analytics and no deep enterprise features
  • annual billing savings can be limited or absent

Loomly

  • Free trial with full feature access and no credit card required
  • Best for visual-first, collaborative startups
  • Suited to approval-heavy content review workflows
  • Among the strongest advertised savings in its category

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Buffer vs Loomly”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/buffer-vs-loomly, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.