Ceipal ATSUnified Talent Platform for Hiring, Vendors & Workforce
vs
HiredRecruiting
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Ceipal ATS vs Hired
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Hired is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 3.3 versus 1.4 for Ceipal ATS.
Choose Ceipal ATS if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 2 coverage
Choose Hired if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.3 vs 1.4)
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Ceipal ATS | Hired |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.4% | 3.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #50 | #25 |
| Share of voice | 0.3% | 0.7% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 50% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Ceipal ATS 0pp · Hired 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Hired leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Ceipal ATSHired
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Ceipal ATS ranked higher
0Hired ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Ceipal ATS | Hired |
|---|---|---|
| Compliance | SOC 2 | — |
| Support | Dedicated support | — |
| Founded | 2015 | — |
| Headquarters | Rochester, NY | Jacksonville, Florida, USA (parent LHH) |
| Employees | 201–500 | 5,000+ |
| Funding | Series B | Series D · $133M raised |
| Best for | Healthcare staffing firms, IT and general staffing firms, and enterprise recruiting teams | Employers hiring tech and sales talent |
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Ceipal ATS vs Hired”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/ceipal-ats-vs-hired, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.