Ceipal ATSUnified Talent Platform for Hiring, Vendors & Workforce
vs
RecruiterflowAI-native ATS and CRM for executive search, recruiting and staffing agencies
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Ceipal ATS vs Recruiterflow
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Recruiterflow is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 3.1 versus 1.4 for Ceipal ATS.
Choose Ceipal ATS if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 33% positive)
- You need SOC 2 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
Choose Recruiterflow if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.1 vs 1.4)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 1 or ISO 27001 or GDPR coverage
- Attractive for recruitment agencies and staffing teams
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Ceipal ATS | Recruiterflow |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.4% | 3.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #50 | #30 |
| Share of voice | 0.3% | 0.7% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | 50% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Ceipal ATS 0pp · Recruiterflow 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Recruiterflow leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Ceipal ATSRecruiterflow
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Ceipal ATS ranked higher
0Recruiterflow ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Ceipal ATS | Recruiterflow |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | $149 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Deployment | — | SaaS |
| Integrations | — | 30+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 | SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 1, ISO 27001, GDPR |
| Support | Dedicated support | SLA-backed support, Dedicated implementation, Live chat with a rep, FAQ and help articles |
| Founded | 2015 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Rochester, NY | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series B | Bootstrapped |
| Best for | Healthcare staffing firms, IT and general staffing firms, and enterprise recruiting teams | Retained, contingent and executive search firms and recruiting and staffing agencies that want AI tools alongside a full ATS and CRM |
Plans side by side
Ceipal ATS
Pricing not available.
Recruiterflow
Platform Plan$149per user / month
AIRA PlanCustomcustom pricing (contact sales)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Ceipal ATS
Profile in progress.
Recruiterflow
- Attractive for recruitment agencies and staffing teams
- Priced at $119/user/month billed annually
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Ceipal ATS vs Recruiterflow”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/ceipal-ats-vs-recruiterflow, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.