CeloxisEnterprise project and portfolio management in one execution platform.
vs
LinearThe product development system for teams and agents
Comparison · Project Management · weekly run Nov 3
Celoxis vs Linear
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Linear is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 7.9 versus 4.6 for Celoxis, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Celoxis if…
- You need ISO 27001 or AICPA SOC 2 Type 2 or EU GDPR or UK GDPR coverage
- Portfolio planning and scenario analysis
- Strong ratings in some comparison research
Choose Linear if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.9 vs 4.6)
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (54% vs 25% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR or HIPAA (BAA available) or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Celoxis | Linear |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 4.6% | 7.9% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Project Management | #17 | #12 |
| Share of voice | 1.5% | 2% |
| Mentions this run | 9 | 11 |
| Positive in AI answers | 25% | 54% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Celoxis 0pp · Linear 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Linear leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CeloxisLinear
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
0Celoxis ranked higher
3Linear ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Celoxis | Linear |
|---|---|---|---|
| How do I choose a project management tool for a mid-market team? | Perplexity | #9 | #7 |
| Best project management tool for startups | Perplexity | #7 | #2 |
| Which project management tool has transparent pricing? | AI Mode | #6 | #3 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Celoxis | Linear |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $10 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $10 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud or on-premise | Cloud-hosted SaaS; workspace data can be stored in the European Union or the United States |
| Integrations | 400+ | — |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, AICPA SOC 2 Type 2, EU GDPR, UK GDPR | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA (BAA available), ISO/IEC 27001:2022 |
| Support | 24x5 support with real people, Standard, Premium and VIP support tiers by plan, Dedicated account manager through rollout | Priority support (Enterprise plan), Account manager (Enterprise plan) |
| Founded | 2001 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Pune, India | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | — |
| Funding | — | Series C · $134M raised |
| Best for | PMOs and project-driven teams that need to manage portfolios, resources, budgets and risks together. | Product and engineering teams that build software and want humans and AI agents working in one shared system |
Plans side by side
Celoxis
Core$10per Standard user per month, billed annually
Essentials$25per Standard user per month, billed annually
Professional$35per Standard user per month, billed annually
Business$45per Standard user per month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing
Linear
Free$0free for everyone
Basic$10per user/month, billed yearly
Business$16per user/month, billed yearly
EnterpriseCustomannual billing only
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Celoxis
- Portfolio planning and scenario analysis
- Strong ratings in some comparison research
Linear
- Fast issue tracking for software engineering teams
- Generous free plan
- Transparent, scalable pricing tiers
- Good fit for SaaS and tech product teams
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Celoxis vs Linear”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/celoxis-vs-linear, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.