CeloxisEnterprise project and portfolio management in one execution platform.
vs
ShortcutFast project management for software teams and their agents
Comparison · Project Management · weekly run Nov 3
Celoxis vs Shortcut
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Celoxis is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 4.6 versus 0.3 for Shortcut.
Choose Celoxis if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (4.6 vs 0.3)
- AI answers describe it more positively (25% vs 0% positive)
- You need ISO 27001 or AICPA SOC 2 Type 2 or EU GDPR or UK GDPR coverage
- Portfolio planning and scenario analysis
Choose Shortcut if…
- You want a free plan to start
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or GDPR or HIPAA (BAA on Business and Enterprise plans) coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Celoxis | Shortcut |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 4.6% | 0.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Project Management | #17 | #43 |
| Share of voice | 1.5% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 9 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 25% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Celoxis 0pp · Shortcut 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Celoxis leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CeloxisShortcut
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Celoxis ranked higher
0Shortcut ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Celoxis | Shortcut |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $10 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $8.5 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud or on-premise | Cloud-based |
| Integrations | 400+ | — |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, AICPA SOC 2 Type 2, EU GDPR, UK GDPR | SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, HIPAA (BAA on Business and Enterprise plans) |
| Support | 24x5 support with real people, Standard, Premium and VIP support tiers by plan, Dedicated account manager through rollout | Help Center, Community Slack channel, Email support@shortcut.com, Premier support SLAs on Enterprise plan |
| Founded | 2001 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Pune, India | New York, NY, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | — | Seed rounds · $39M raised |
| Best for | PMOs and project-driven teams that need to manage portfolios, resources, budgets and risks together. | Software teams, including product and engineering teams, that want lightweight project management with issue tracking. |
Plans side by side
Celoxis
Core$10per Standard user per month, billed annually
Essentials$25per Standard user per month, billed annually
Professional$35per Standard user per month, billed annually
Business$45per Standard user per month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing
Shortcut
Free Plan$0per user/month
Team Plan$8.5per user/month
Business Plan$12per user/month
Enterprise PlanCustom
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Celoxis
- Portfolio planning and scenario analysis
- Strong ratings in some comparison research
Shortcut
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Celoxis vs Shortcut”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/celoxis-vs-shortcut, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.