CeloxisEnterprise project and portfolio management in one execution platform.
vs
TaskadeOne prompt. One live app.
Comparison · Project Management · weekly run Nov 3
Celoxis vs Taskade
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Celoxis is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 4.6 versus 0.6 for Taskade.
Choose Celoxis if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (4.6 vs 0.6)
- You need more native integrations (400+ vs 168+)
- You need ISO 27001 or AICPA SOC 2 Type 2 or EU GDPR or UK GDPR coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
Choose Taskade if…
- You want a free plan to start
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Best suited for AI-native multi-agent systems
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Celoxis | Taskade |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 4.6% | 0.6% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Project Management | #17 | #39 |
| Share of voice | 1.5% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 9 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 25% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Celoxis 0pp · Taskade 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Celoxis leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CeloxisTaskade
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Celoxis ranked higher
0Taskade ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Celoxis | Taskade |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $10 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $6 / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud or on-premise | Cloud-hosted SaaS; Taskade hosts every published app with hosting and a database included |
| Integrations | 400+ | 168+ |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, AICPA SOC 2 Type 2, EU GDPR, UK GDPR | — |
| Support | 24x5 support with real people, Standard, Premium and VIP support tiers by plan, Dedicated account manager through rollout | Priority support with senior engineers (Business plan), Premium support with SLAs and onboarding (Enterprise plan) |
| Founded | 2001 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Pune, India | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 11–50 |
| Funding | — | Seed, undisclosed, reported as led by TRAC (not confirmed by other sources) · $5M raised |
| Best for | PMOs and project-driven teams that need to manage portfolios, resources, budgets and risks together. | Operators and small teams who need custom business apps such as CRMs, trackers and client portals without coding, and agencies that build for clients on the Business plan |
Plans side by side
Celoxis
Core$10per Standard user per month, billed annually
Essentials$25per Standard user per month, billed annually
Professional$35per Standard user per month, billed annually
Business$45per Standard user per month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing
Taskade
Free$0per month, billed monthly
Starter$6per month, or $72 billed yearly, 3 users
Pro$10per month, or $120 billed yearly, 10 users
Business$25per month, or $300 billed yearly, unlimited users
Max$100per month, or $1,200 billed yearly, unlimited users
EnterpriseCustomcustom, contact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Celoxis
- Portfolio planning and scenario analysis
- Strong ratings in some comparison research
Taskade
- Best suited for AI-native multi-agent systems
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Celoxis vs Taskade”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/celoxis-vs-taskade, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.