ChatGPTAI Coding Assistants
vs
MakeAI automation you can visually build and orchestrate in real time.
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
ChatGPT vs Make
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Make is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 17 versus 3.3 for ChatGPT, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose ChatGPT if…
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- strong performance on complex tasks like research and deep context
- general-purpose work
Choose Make if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (17 vs 3.3)
- AI answers describe it more positively (41% vs 0% positive)
- You need GDPR or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 or ISO 27001 coverage
- Free tier with 1,000 credits per month
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | ChatGPT | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.3% | 17% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #29 | #9 |
| Share of voice | 0.6% | 3.6% |
| Mentions this run | 4 | 24 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 41% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
ChatGPT 0pp · Make 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Make leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ChatGPTMake
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
1ChatGPT ranked higher
0Make ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | ChatGPT | Make |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best AI Agents tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #2 | #14 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | ChatGPT | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | — | Cloud, hosted on Amazon AWS |
| Integrations | — | 3500+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2 | GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, ISO 27001 |
| Support | — | Help center, Community forum, 24/7 support on Enterprise plans, Dedicated support team on Enterprise plans |
| Founded | — | 2012 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco | Prague, Czech Republic |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 201–500 |
| Funding | In progress, seeking up to $20 billion, reported at $1.25 trillion post-money | — |
| Best for | — | Teams and organizations deploying AI and automation across the business, from a single department to company-wide. |
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
ChatGPT
- strong performance on complex tasks like research and deep context
- general-purpose work
- coding agent available across ChatGPT, desktop, web, CLI and IDE workflows
- higher price point
- access depends on eligible paid plan
- limited usage on the free plan
Make
- Free tier with 1,000 credits per month
- Transparent pricing with paid plans from $12/month
- Visual, no-code automation between existing apps
- Integrations with more than 3,000 apps
- Built-in AI agents for business workflows
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “ChatGPT vs Make”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/chatgpt-vs-make, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.