CircleCIAutonomous validation for the AI era
vs
Concourse CIConcourse is an open-source continuous thing-doer.
Comparison · CI/CD · weekly run Nov 3
CircleCI vs Concourse CI
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
CircleCI is the stronger AI pick in CI/CD: it has a visibility score of 36.9 versus 0.6 for Concourse CI.
Choose CircleCI if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (36.9 vs 0.6)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need FedRAMP Tailored (LI-SaaS) or SOC 2 Type II coverage
- fast builds and parallelism
Choose Concourse CI if…
- No licensing fees when self-hosted
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | CircleCI | Concourse CI |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 36.9% | 0.6% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in CI/CD | #4 | #30 |
| Share of voice | 9% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 54 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 43% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
CircleCI 0pp · Concourse CI 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
CircleCI leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CircleCIConcourse CI
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0CircleCI ranked higher
0Concourse CI ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | CircleCI | Concourse CI |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $15 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted service with CircleCI compute and self-hosted runners, or self-managed on the customer's own infrastructure | Distributed as a single concourse binary, easy to run almost anywhere, especially with Docker. |
| Compliance | FedRAMP Tailored (LI-SaaS), SOC 2 Type II | — |
| Support | Community support forum (all plans), Ticket-based global support (Performance and Scale plans), 8x5 and 24x7 SLA options as add-ons | — |
| Founded | 2011 | — |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, United States | — |
| Employees | 201–500 | — |
| Funding | Series F | — |
| Best for | Engineering teams that want fast, scalable CI/CD across cloud and self-hosted infrastructure, from startups to enterprises | — |
Plans side by side
Concourse CI
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
CircleCI
- fast builds and parallelism
- flexible cloud and hybrid CI/CD platform
- free tier with no credit card required
- transparent usage-based credit pricing
- rich integrations and insights
- no standard annual discount
- credit-based pricing less simple than flat rates
Concourse CI
- No licensing fees when self-hosted
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “CircleCI vs Concourse CI”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/circleci-vs-concourse-ci, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.