Cisco Duo vs Omada
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Cisco Duo is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 16.5 versus 0.6 for Omada, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Cisco Duo if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (16.5 vs 0.6)
- AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 0% positive)
- You need FedRAMP High (Duo Federal) or FedRAMP Moderate (Duo Federal) or GovRAMP or TX-RAMP or FIPS 140-3 coverage
- Low-friction, reliable MFA
Choose Omada if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 3 coverage
- Recommended as a dedicated IGA product for heavy audit, complex role, ERP, or on-premises needs
- Named among IGA leaders in KuppingerCole 2024 Leadership Compass
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Cisco Duo | Omada |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 16.5% | 0.6% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.6% | up+0.6% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #6 | #34 |
| Share of voice | 4.2% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 14 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 50% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Cisco Duo +0.10000000000000142pp · Omada 0pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Cisco Duo leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Cisco Duo | Omada |
|---|---|---|---|
| What should a identity and access management platform integrate with? | ChatGPT | #4 | #9 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Cisco Duo | Omada |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $3 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | SaaS on Microsoft Azure (EU or US region), private tenant, or on-premises |
| Integrations | 500+ | — |
| Compliance | FedRAMP High (Duo Federal), FedRAMP Moderate (Duo Federal), GovRAMP, TX-RAMP, FIPS 140-3 | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3 |
| Support | Technical documentation, Knowledge base, Community | Customer Success Team, Service Desk, ITSM system access, Professional services |
| Founded | 2010 | 2000 |
| Headquarters | Ann Arbor, MI, United States | Copenhagen, Denmark |
| Employees | — | 201–500 |
| Funding | Venture Round | Majority investment (GRO and Kirk Kapital) |
| Best for | Organizations from small businesses to enterprises and government that want phishing-resistant MFA and simple IAM. | Regulated enterprises and government organizations that need identity governance and administration |
Plans side by side
Cisco Duo
Omada
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Cisco Duo
- Low-friction, reliable MFA
- Zero Trust device trust and endpoint visibility
- Phishing-resistant MFA, SSO, and device trust
- Free tier for up to 10 users
- Highest PeerSpot rating among access-management products
Omada
- Recommended as a dedicated IGA product for heavy audit, complex role, ERP, or on-premises needs
- Named among IGA leaders in KuppingerCole 2024 Leadership Compass
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Cisco Duo vs Omada”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cisco-duo-vs-omada, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.