Cisco Duo vs Ping Identity
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Ping Identity is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 22.5 versus 16.5 for Cisco Duo, and ranks ahead in 71% of the answers that name both.
Choose Cisco Duo if…
- You need more native integrations (500+ vs 350+)
- AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 36% positive)
- You need FedRAMP High (Duo Federal) or FedRAMP Moderate (Duo Federal) or GovRAMP or TX-RAMP or FIPS 140-3 coverage
- Low-friction, reliable MFA
Choose Ping Identity if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (22.5 vs 16.5)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 or ISO 27001 coverage
- Enterprise-grade identity security for large enterprises
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Cisco Duo | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 16.5% | 22.5% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.6% | down−2.2% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #6 | #4 |
| Share of voice | 4.2% | 7.5% |
| Mentions this run | 14 | 23 |
| Positive in AI answers | 50% | 36% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Cisco Duo +0.10000000000000142pp · Ping Identity −4.699999999999999pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Ping Identity leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
7 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Cisco Duo | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best Identity & Access Management tools in 2026? | AI Mode | #7 | #6 |
| Compare the leading Identity & Access Management platforms | ChatGPT | #8 | #3 |
| Alternatives to the most popular identity and access management platform | AI Mode | #9 | #4 |
| Alternatives to the most popular identity and access management platform | Perplexity | #5 | #3 |
| Which identity and access management platform offers a free trial? | Perplexity | #2 | #5 |
| Which Identity & Access Management tools offer annual discounts? | Perplexity | #5 | #4 |
| Where can I sign up for a identity and access management platform? | Perplexity | #3 | #4 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Cisco Duo | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $3 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Multi-tenant cloud, dedicated-tenant cloud, self-managed on-premises, hybrid, and FedRAMP-authorized environments |
| Integrations | 500+ | 350+ |
| Compliance | FedRAMP High (Duo Federal), FedRAMP Moderate (Duo Federal), GovRAMP, TX-RAMP, FIPS 140-3 | SOC 2, ISO 27001 |
| Support | Technical documentation, Knowledge base, Community | — |
| Founded | 2010 | 2002 |
| Headquarters | Ann Arbor, MI, United States | Denver, CO, United States |
| Employees | — | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Venture Round | Acquisition by Thoma Bravo (take-private) |
| Best for | Organizations from small businesses to enterprises and government that want phishing-resistant MFA and simple IAM. | Large enterprises and government bodies managing customer, workforce, partner and AI agent identities at scale |
Plans side by side
Cisco Duo
Ping Identity
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Cisco Duo
- Low-friction, reliable MFA
- Zero Trust device trust and endpoint visibility
- Phishing-resistant MFA, SSO, and device trust
- Free tier for up to 10 users
- Highest PeerSpot rating among access-management products
Ping Identity
- Enterprise-grade identity security for large enterprises
- Strong for complex hybrid and federated environments
- Advanced federation, SSO, and directory services
- Strong customer identity (CIAM) and fraud prevention
- Highly rated by analysts and users
- Enterprise deployments can stretch budgets
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Cisco Duo vs Ping Identity”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cisco-duo-vs-ping-identity, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.