ClearMLThe Infrastructure Platform For AI Builders
vs
HopsworksThe AI Lakehouse for Real-Time ML
Comparison · MLOps Platforms · weekly run Nov 2
ClearML vs Hopsworks
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
ClearML is the stronger AI pick in MLOps Platforms: it has a visibility score of 20.6 versus 0.3 for Hopsworks.
Choose ClearML if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (20.6 vs 0.3)
- AI answers describe it more positively (43% vs 0% positive)
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
- open-source flexibility
Choose Hopsworks if…
- You need ISO 27001 or SOC 2 Type II or GDPR or HIPAA coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | ClearML | Hopsworks |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 20.6% | 0.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in MLOps Platforms | #8 | #52 |
| Share of voice | 4.5% | 0.1% |
| Mentions this run | 30 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 43% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
ClearML 0pp · Hopsworks 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
ClearML leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ClearMLHopsworks
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0ClearML ranked higher
0Hopsworks ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | ClearML | Hopsworks |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $15 per seat / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Hosted servers, self-hosted, or a managed service in a VPC, on-premises (including air-gapped) or hybrid. | Fully managed SaaS, self-hosted on Kubernetes, on-premises, air-gapped and hybrid |
| Compliance | — | ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA |
| Support | Dedicated Slack channel (Scale), Standard SLA (Scale), White-glove support with custom SLA (Enterprise), Professional services (Enterprise) | Community support, Dedicated support team and custom integrations on Enterprise plan, Platform SLA on Enterprise plan |
| Founded | 2016 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Stockholm, Sweden |
| Employees | 11–50 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Series B (reported for parent Allegro AI, unverified, led by New Enterprise Associates) · $16M raised | Series B |
| Best for | Individuals, researchers and small teams on the free plan, growing AI teams on Pro, and enterprises running GPU clusters for multiple large projects. | Teams building production ML systems that need real-time feature serving and reuse of features across models |
Plans side by side
ClearML
Community$0month
Pro$15user/month + usage
ScaleCustomcustom quote
EnterpriseCustomcustom quote
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
ClearML
- open-source flexibility
- transparent, clear pricing with a free self-hosted tier
- end-to-end MLOps coverage in one platform
- GPU orchestration and pipeline automation
- affordable choice for cost-conscious teams
Hopsworks
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “ClearML vs Hopsworks”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/clearml-vs-hopsworks, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.