ClineAI Coding, Open Source and Open Choice
vs
CodacyCode Quality & Security for AI-Assisted Engineering
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3
Cline vs Codacy
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Cline is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 5.3 versus 0.4 for Codacy.
Choose Cline if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.3 vs 0.4)
- AI answers describe it more positively (54% vs 0% positive)
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Open-source with bring-your-own API key
Choose Codacy if…
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 (cloud infrastructure) coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Cline | Codacy |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.3% | 0.4% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #16 | #35 |
| Share of voice | 2.6% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 13 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 54% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Cline 0pp · Codacy 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Cline leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ClineCodacy
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Cline ranked higher
0Codacy ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Cline | Codacy |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Per seat |
| Entry price | Contact sales | Free; paid from $18 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Runs in your editor, terminal or own apps, with local or cloud AI models, and VPC deployments on Enterprise. | Cloud-hosted |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type 2 (cloud infrastructure) |
| Support | Community support for the open-source version, Priority and dedicated support on Enterprise, SLA on Enterprise | Standard support via email and in-app chat, Priority support via screen sharing and video chat, Dedicated Customer Success Manager and Solutions Engineer on Business plan |
| Founded | — | 2012 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA, United States | Lisbon, Portugal |
| Employees | 11–50 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Seed · $32M raised | Series B · $28M raised |
| Best for | Individual developers and teams who want an open-source agent with their own provider keys, and organizations that need SSO, audit logs and team management on Enterprise. | Fast-paced engineering teams building fast-growing codebases |
Plans side by side
Codacy
Developer$0per dev/mth, free forever
Team$18per dev/mth, yearly billing (from $21 monthly)
BusinessCustomcustom, per dev/mth, billed annually
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Cline
- Open-source with bring-your-own API key
- Granular model control and choice of models
- Reliable handling of large codebase modifications
- Free, flexible setup
- Fits strict privacy and compliance needs with approved models
- Team must pay model-token API costs
Codacy
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Cline vs Codacy”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cline-vs-codacy, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.