Skip to content
SlateIndex
CursorAI Coding Agent for Building Ambitious Software
vs
DevinThe autonomous software engineer
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3

Cursor vs Devin

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Cursor is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 67.7 versus 16.9 for Devin, and ranks ahead in 93% of the answers that name both.

Choose Cursor if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (67.7 vs 16.9)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (53% vs 12% positive)
  • You need AIUC-1 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 coverage
  • Strong codebase indexing and multi-file editing

Choose Devin if…

  • You need ISO 27001 coverage
  • Robust free tier with unlimited autocomplete
  • Best value agentic editor
  • Fully autonomous software engineering

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Cursor Devin
Visibility score67.7%16.9%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in AI Coding Assistants#2#5
Share of voice13.6%6.1%
Mentions this run6529
Positive in AI answers53%12%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Cursor 68%

Cursor 0pp · Devin 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Cursor leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
78.7%
18.1%
AI Mode
73.5%
23.1%
Perplexity
50.9%
9.4%
CursorDevin

Head to head in AI answers

28 engine answers name both brands

26Cursor ranked higher
2Devin ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionCursorDevin
Pricing model—Flat tiers
Entry price—Free; paid from $20 / mo
Free plan—Yes
DeploymentDesktop, CLI, web, mobile and cloud agentsCloud agent at app.devin.ai and a local CLI, with dedicated VPC deployment on Enterprise plans
ComplianceAIUC-1, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, SOC 2 Type IISOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001
SupportCustomer support by email at hi@cursor.com, Priority support on the Enterprise planPriority support on Team plan, Dedicated Slack Connect channel for support, Dedicated account and engineering support on Enterprise plan, Optional onboarding call
Headquarters—San Francisco
Employees501–1,000—
FundingFunding round at $9.9B valuationSeries E · $3700M raised
Best forIndividual developers and engineering teams that hand coding tasks to AI agents, and larger organizations that need enterprise security and admin controls.Engineering teams that want to hand well-scoped coding, testing and maintenance tasks to parallel AI agents

Plans side by side

Cursor

Pricing not available.

Devin

Free$0month
Pro$20month
Max$200month
Teams$80month for team plan, plus $40/mo per full dev seat
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Devin pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Cursor

  • Strong codebase indexing and multi-file editing
  • High user satisfaction and momentum
  • Top overall pick for professional developers
  • Transparent pricing tiers and annual discount
  • Free tier to try it
  • Shared credit pool makes heavy agentic usage less predictable
  • Free Hobby plan has limited usage

Devin

  • Robust free tier with unlimited autocomplete
  • Best value agentic editor
  • Fully autonomous software engineering
  • Acts as a collaborative partner with parallel flows and self-correction
  • Multi-file edits and deep context across large directories
  • Fit depends on governance and workflow requirements

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Cursor vs Devin”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cursor-vs-devin, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.