CursorAI Coding Agent for Building Ambitious Software
vs
DevinThe autonomous software engineer
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3
Cursor vs Devin
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Cursor is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 67.7 versus 16.9 for Devin, and ranks ahead in 93% of the answers that name both.
Choose Cursor if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (67.7 vs 16.9)
- AI answers describe it more positively (53% vs 12% positive)
- You need AIUC-1 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 coverage
- Strong codebase indexing and multi-file editing
Choose Devin if…
- You need ISO 27001 coverage
- Robust free tier with unlimited autocomplete
- Best value agentic editor
- Fully autonomous software engineering
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Cursor | Devin |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 67.7% | 16.9% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #2 | #5 |
| Share of voice | 13.6% | 6.1% |
| Mentions this run | 65 | 29 |
| Positive in AI answers | 53% | 12% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Cursor 0pp · Devin 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Cursor leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CursorDevin
Head to head in AI answers
28 engine answers name both brands
26Cursor ranked higher
2Devin ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Cursor | Devin |
|---|---|---|---|
| How do I choose an AI coding assistant for a mid-market team? | ChatGPT | #3 | #5 |
| How do I choose an AI coding assistant for a mid-market team? | AI Mode | #3 | #4 |
| What are common mistakes when buying an AI coding assistant? | ChatGPT | #1 | #3 |
| What are the best AI coding assistant tools in 2026? | ChatGPT | #1 | #6 |
| Best AI coding assistant for startups | ChatGPT | #1 | #7 |
| Which AI coding assistant has the best reviews? | ChatGPT | #1 | #4 |
| Which AI coding assistant has the best reviews? | AI Mode | #1 | #4 |
| Compare the leading AI coding assistant platforms | ChatGPT | #2 | #7 |
| Compare the leading AI coding assistant platforms | AI Mode | #1 | #2 |
| Compare the leading AI coding assistant platforms | Perplexity | #2 | #9 |
| Alternatives to the most popular AI coding assistant | ChatGPT | #2 | #6 |
| Alternatives to the most popular AI coding assistant | AI Mode | #2 | #4 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Cursor | Devin |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $20 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Desktop, CLI, web, mobile and cloud agents | Cloud agent at app.devin.ai and a local CLI, with dedicated VPC deployment on Enterprise plans |
| Compliance | AIUC-1, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, SOC 2 Type II | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 |
| Support | Customer support by email at hi@cursor.com, Priority support on the Enterprise plan | Priority support on Team plan, Dedicated Slack Connect channel for support, Dedicated account and engineering support on Enterprise plan, Optional onboarding call |
| Headquarters | — | San Francisco |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | — |
| Funding | Funding round at $9.9B valuation | Series E · $3700M raised |
| Best for | Individual developers and engineering teams that hand coding tasks to AI agents, and larger organizations that need enterprise security and admin controls. | Engineering teams that want to hand well-scoped coding, testing and maintenance tasks to parallel AI agents |
Plans side by side
Cursor
Pricing not available.
Devin
Free$0month
Pro$20month
Max$200month
Teams$80month for team plan, plus $40/mo per full dev seat
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Cursor
- Strong codebase indexing and multi-file editing
- High user satisfaction and momentum
- Top overall pick for professional developers
- Transparent pricing tiers and annual discount
- Free tier to try it
- Shared credit pool makes heavy agentic usage less predictable
- Free Hobby plan has limited usage
Devin
- Robust free tier with unlimited autocomplete
- Best value agentic editor
- Fully autonomous software engineering
- Acts as a collaborative partner with parallel flows and self-correction
- Multi-file edits and deep context across large directories
- Fit depends on governance and workflow requirements
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Cursor vs Devin”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cursor-vs-devin, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.