Cursor
NewAI Coding Agent for Building Ambitious Software
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
- Cursor ranks #2 of 46 in AI Coding Assistants with an AI visibility score of 67.7 (SlateIndex, Nov 3, 2026).
- Cursor is most visible on ChatGPT (78.7) and least on Perplexity (50.9).
- AI engines name Cursor in 28 of the 30 AI Coding Assistants buyer prompts SlateIndex tracks.
- github.com is the source AI engines cite most in answers about Cursor, with 46 citations.
About
Company details for Cursor
Cursor is a coding agent for building software. Its agents plan, write, test and review code across a desktop editor, a CLI, web and mobile, and cloud agents can run in parallel. Cursor also sells Origin code hosting, Bugbot AI code review and a plugin marketplace. It ranks #2 of 46 in AI Coding Assistants on SlateIndex and has a visibility score of 67.7 in the latest weekly run.
Its differentiator: agents that use their own computers to build, test and demo features end to end for review.
- Website
- cursor.com
- Categories
- AI Coding Assistants
- Company size
- 501–1,000 employees
- Company type
- Division of SpaceX
- Funding
- Funding round at $9.9B valuation
- Deployment
- Desktop, CLI, web, mobile and cloud agents
- Platforms
- macOS, Web, Mobile, CLI
- Compliance
- AIUC-1, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, SOC 2 Type II
- Support
- Customer support by email at hi@cursor.com, Priority support on the Enterprise plan
Read from aissist.io, x.com, cursor.com, linkedin.com, news.crunchbase.com · refreshed Nov 3, 2026.
AI visibility
Latest weekly run · Nov 3 · next run Nov 9
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days, with up to 7 competitors. Click a name to hide or show its line.
Changes appear after the second weekly run in AI Coding Assistants. GitHub Copilot leads the category at 76.5%.
Media
Website and product screenshots for Cursor
AI mentions & citations
Recent answers that name Cursor
What features matter most in an AI coding assistant?
What are common mistakes when buying an AI coding assistant?
Whether you're an individual developer, startup, or engineering team, here are the most common mistakes to avoid when evaluating tools such as Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Windsurf, Claude Code, and similar products.
What should an AI coding assistant integrate with?
A standalone AI coding agent (like Cursor or Claude Code)
What are the best AI coding assistant tools in 2026?
My overall recommendation: Start with Cursor if you want an excellent everyday coding environment, Claude Code if you want a powerful autonomous coding agent, or GitHub Copilot if affordability and IDE compatibility…
Best AI coding assistant for startups
(My top recommendation: Cursor)
Which AI coding assistant has the best reviews?
As of November 2026, my recommendation is Cursor for the best overall AI coding experience, while Claude Code is arguably the strongest choice for complex programming tasks.
Which AI coding assistant tools offer annual discounts?
Best overall value: Cursor Plus — $80/year, or $6.67/month equivalent.
What are the best AI coding assistant tools in 2026?
Cursor : Widely regarded as the top pick for everyday IDE workflows and complex, multi-file projects.
Products & features
What Cursor sells
Cursor Desktop
Desktop editor for agentic coding in a familiar IDE.
Cursor CLI
Runs agents in any terminal, script or editor.
Cloud agents
Agents that use their own computers to build, test and demo features for review, run in parallel.
Bugbot
AI code reviews on pull requests.
Origin
Code hosting platform.
Strengths engines cite
- Strong codebase indexing and multi-file editing
- High user satisfaction and momentum
- Top overall pick for professional developers
- Transparent pricing tiers and annual discount
- Free tier to try it
Target market & buyers
Engineering teams and developers, including large enterprises; trusted by over half of the Fortune 500.
Notable customers include Stripe, NVIDIA, Brex, Coinbase, Datadog, Rippling, monday.com, eBay.
| Industry | Primary use case |
|---|---|
| Software development | Planning, writing, testing and reviewing code with autonomous agents. |
Funding & recent developments
Funding
| Round | Year | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Series D | 2025 | $2300M |
| Series A | — | $60M |
| Series B | — | $105M |
| Funding round at $9.9B valuation | — | $900M |
| Latest known round | Total raised |
|---|---|
| Funding round at $9.9B valuation | — |
Recent developments
- Oct 2026ProductAgent SDK
Cursor released an Agent SDK, listed in its changelog.
- Oct 2026ProductOrigin app marketplace
Cursor launched the Origin app marketplace.
- Aug 2026CompanyCursor becomes part of SpaceX
The acquisition by SpaceX completed and Cursor is now part of SpaceX.
- Aug 2026ProductOrigin code hosting launched
Cursor launched Origin, a code-hosting platform that rivals GitHub.
- Oct 2025FundingSeries D funding
Raised $2.3B at a $29.3B valuation, co-led by Accel and Coatue.
Competitive landscape
How Cursor compares with its top three alternatives
Cursor most often appears alongside GitHub Copilot, Claude, Devin in AI answers.
| Brand | Visibility | Share of voice | vs last week | Starting price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cursor | 67.7% | 13.6% | New | Pricing not available |
| GitHub Copilot | 76.5% | 14.7% | New | Pricing not available |
| Claude | 47.5% | 11% | New | Pricing not available |
| Devin | 16.9% | 6.1% | New | Free plan |
| Tabnine | 16% | 6.3% | New | Pricing not available |
What AI answers say
Sentiment and themes from the answers that mention this brand
Positive 53% · Neutral 37% · Mixed 10% of 70 engine answers that mention Cursor
Praised for
- Strong codebase indexing and multi-file editing
- High user satisfaction and momentum
- Top overall pick for professional developers
- Transparent pricing tiers and annual discount
- Free tier to try it
Criticised for
- Shared credit pool makes heavy agentic usage less predictable
- Free Hobby plan has limited usage
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Cursor AI visibility profile”, https://slateindex.ai/brand/cursor, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.