Cline vs Sourcegraph Cody
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Sourcegraph Cody is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 7.7 versus 5.3 for Cline, and ranks ahead in 14% of the answers that name both.
Choose Cline if…
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (54% vs 0% positive)
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Open-source with bring-your-own API key
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.7 vs 5.3)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Cline | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.3% | 7.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #16 | #12 |
| Share of voice | 2.6% | 3.3% |
| Mentions this run | 13 | 16 |
| Positive in AI answers | 54% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Cline 0pp · Sourcegraph Cody 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Sourcegraph Cody leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
7 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Cline | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best AI coding assistant tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #9 | #14 |
| Top AI coding assistant options for B2B SaaS companies | Perplexity | #9 | #11 |
| Compare the leading AI coding assistant platforms | AI Mode | #6 | #7 |
| Compare the leading AI coding assistant platforms | Perplexity | #11 | #14 |
| Alternatives to the most popular AI coding assistant | Perplexity | #11 | #15 |
| Most affordable AI coding assistant that is still reliable | Perplexity | #5 | #7 |
| Official website of the top AI coding assistant vendors | Perplexity | #15 | #12 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Cline | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Per seat |
| Entry price | Contact sales | $16,000 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment | Runs in your editor, terminal or own apps, with local or cloud AI models, and VPC deployments on Enterprise. | Single-tenant cloud, self-hosted, or bring-your-own cloud for air-gapped environments |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 |
| Support | Community support for the open-source version, Priority and dedicated support on Enterprise, SLA on Enterprise | 24×5 support, Customer success manager, Optional premium support |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA, United States | San Francisco, California, US |
| Employees | 11–50 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Seed · $32M raised | Later-stage deal · $225M raised |
| Best for | Individual developers and teams who want an open-source agent with their own provider keys, and organizations that need SSO, audit logs and team management on Enterprise. | Enterprise engineering teams working on large, complex codebases |
Plans side by side
Sourcegraph Cody
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Cline
- Open-source with bring-your-own API key
- Granular model control and choice of models
- Reliable handling of large codebase modifications
- Free, flexible setup
- Fits strict privacy and compliance needs with approved models
- Team must pay model-token API costs
Sourcegraph Cody
- Free trial available for 30 days
- Pricing lacks transparency for small teams due to reliance on custom sales quotes
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Cline vs Sourcegraph Cody”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cline-vs-sourcegraph-cody, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.