CloudBeesThe governed software delivery solution for the agentic era
vs
DockerRun AI agents and containers safely, anywhere.
Comparison · CI/CD · weekly run Nov 3
CloudBees vs Docker
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Docker is the stronger AI pick in CI/CD: it has a visibility score of 17.2 versus 2.8 for CloudBees.
Choose CloudBees if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 6% positive)
- Enterprise scaling, governance, and support for Jenkins
- Deep enterprise Jenkins foundation with advanced software delivery management
- Broad plugin ecosystem via Jenkins
Choose Docker if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (17.2 vs 2.8)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 attestation for Docker Hub and Scout or ISO 27001 certification or ISO 27701 certified privacy program coverage
- Broad support for Docker and Kubernetes workflows
- Reliable for containerized, Docker-based workflows
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | CloudBees | Docker |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.8% | 17.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in CI/CD | #20 | #7 |
| Share of voice | 1% | 4.5% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 27 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 6% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
CloudBees 0pp · Docker 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Docker leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CloudBeesDocker
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0CloudBees ranked higher
0Docker ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | CloudBees | Docker |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $11 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Hybrid and multi-cloud environments | Local and Docker-managed cloud |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type 2 attestation for Docker Hub and Scout, ISO 27001 certification, ISO 27701 certified privacy program |
| Support | Support team | Community forums and Community Slack, Support tickets with 5, 2 or 1 business day response SLAs by plan, Premium Support and TAM add-on with 24x7 response |
| Founded | 2010 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | San Jose, CA, United States | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Series F, with Goldman Sachs Asset Management private credit clients leading | Funding round |
| Best for | Large enterprises that need to govern CI/CD and agentic coding across mixed toolchains | Individual developers, growing teams and large enterprises that run AI coding agents and need security teams to govern them |
Plans side by side
CloudBees
Pricing not available.
Docker
Docker Personal$0per user/month
Docker Pro$11per user/month
Docker Team$16per user/month
Docker Business$24per user/month
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
CloudBees
- Enterprise scaling, governance, and support for Jenkins
- Deep enterprise Jenkins foundation with advanced software delivery management
- Broad plugin ecosystem via Jenkins
- Recognised as a strong CI/CD vendor to evaluate
- Jenkins has been edged out in new adoptions by native CI/CD tools
Docker
- Broad support for Docker and Kubernetes workflows
- Reliable for containerized, Docker-based workflows
- Docker layer caching
- Extra storage fees for Docker layers and images
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “CloudBees vs Docker”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cloudbees-vs-docker, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.