Coassemble vs Litmos
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Litmos is the stronger AI pick in Learning Management: it has a visibility score of 9.4 versus 1.2 for Coassemble, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Coassemble if…
- You want a free plan to start
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose Litmos if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (9.4 vs 1.2)
- You need SOC 2 or SSAE 16 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Coassemble | Litmos |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.2% | 9.4% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Learning Management | #36 | #12 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 3.1% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 17 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Coassemble 0pp · Litmos 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Litmos leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Coassemble | Litmos |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which Learning Management System tools offer annual discounts? | Perplexity | #1 | #7 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Coassemble | Litmos |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $2,500 / mo | $8,000 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment | Hosted with US, EU, UK or AU data residency; self-hosting or dedicated servers on request | SaaS |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | SOC 2, SSAE 16 |
| Support | Knowledge base, AI support, Priority support on the Scale plan, Technical support and dedicated account management on the Strategic Partner plan | Help Center, Customer Hub, Managed Services |
| Founded | 2016 | 2007 |
| Headquarters | Newcastle West, New South Wales, Australia | San Francisco, California, US |
| Employees | 11–50 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series A · $7M raised | — |
| Best for | Engineering and product teams that want training built into their own apps, intranets and Slack | Organizations that train employees, customers, partners and channel teams in one platform |
Plans side by side
Coassemble
Litmos
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Coassemble
Profile in progress.
Litmos
- strong compliance and enterprise training tools
- enterprise capabilities recognised by analysts
- 14-day free trial
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Coassemble vs Litmos”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/coassemble-vs-litmos, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.