CodaThe all-in-one collaborative workspace.
vs
WrikeThe work delivery platform for people and AI
Comparison · Project Management · weekly run Nov 3
Coda vs Wrike
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Wrike is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 13.5 versus 0 for Coda.
Choose Coda if…
- You need more native integrations (600+ vs 400+)
- You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 3 coverage
- Handles structured tabular data and advanced databases flexibly
Choose Wrike if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (13.5 vs 0)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001:2013 or ISO 27018:2019 or CSA STAR or GDPR-compliant or CCPA-compliant coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Multi-department project tracking, time tracking, and customizable workflows
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Coda | Wrike |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 13.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Project Management | #47 | #8 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 4.4% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 26 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 39% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Coda 0pp · Wrike 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Wrike leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CodaWrike
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Coda ranked higher
0Wrike ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Coda | Wrike |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $10 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | — | Cloud-only; data is hosted in Paris, France for European sign-ups and in Santa Clara, California for other accounts |
| Integrations | 600+ | 400+ |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3 | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2013, ISO 27018:2019, CSA STAR, GDPR-compliant, CCPA-compliant |
| Support | Help center, Superhuman community | Professional services and deployment consultancy, Premium support |
| Founded | 2014 | 2006 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco | San Diego, California, US |
| Employees | 201–500 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Series D · $240M raised | Series B |
| Best for | Teams that want docs, spreadsheets and apps in one collaborative workspace. | Enterprises that want AI agents and work management under governed controls at scale |
Plans side by side
Coda
Pricing not available.
Wrike
Free$0user/month
Team$10user/month
Business$25user/month
PinnacleCustomcustom pricing
ApexCustomcustom pricing
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Coda
- Handles structured tabular data and advanced databases flexibly
Wrike
- Multi-department project tracking, time tracking, and customizable workflows
- Request forms, proofing, workload planning, and approvals for creative agencies
- Portfolio controls and risk management for large organizations
- Enterprise-scale planning and reporting
- Managing several complex projects with resource allocation and PMO governance
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Coda vs Wrike”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/coda-vs-wrike, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.