Skip to content
SlateIndex
AsanaWork & Project Management for Human-Agent Teams
vs
WrikeThe work delivery platform for people and AI
Comparison · Project Management · weekly run Nov 3

Asana vs Wrike

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Asana is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 60.9 versus 13.5 for Wrike, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose Asana if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (60.9 vs 13.5)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (42% vs 39% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or FedRAMP Moderate (Asana Gov) coverage
  • Strong for cross-functional structured execution and milestone tracking

Choose Wrike if…

  • You want a lower entry price ($10 vs $10.99)
  • You need more native integrations (400+ vs 100+)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001:2013 or ISO 27018:2019 or CSA STAR or GDPR-compliant or CCPA-compliant coverage
  • Multi-department project tracking, time tracking, and customizable workflows

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Asana Wrike
Visibility score60.9%13.5%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Project Management#1#8
Share of voice11.7%4.4%
Mentions this run6426
Positive in AI answers42%39%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Asana 61%

Asana 0pp · Wrike 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Asana leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
64.8%
18.9%
AI Mode
54.8%
2.2%
Perplexity
63%
19.3%
AsanaWrike

Head to head in AI answers

24 engine answers name both brands

24Asana ranked higher
0Wrike ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionAsanaWrike
Pricing modelPer seatPer seat
Entry priceFree; paid from $10.99 per seat / moFree; paid from $10 per seat / mo
Free planYesYes
DeploymentCloudCloud-only; data is hosted in Paris, France for European sign-ups and in Santa Clara, California for other accounts
Integrations100+400+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type 2, FedRAMP Moderate (Asana Gov)SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2013, ISO 27018:2019, CSA STAR, GDPR-compliant, CCPA-compliant
SupportHelp Center, Community, Asana Academy, Customer SuccessProfessional services and deployment consultancy, Premium support
Founded20082006
HeadquartersSan Francisco, California, United StatesSan Diego, California, US
Employees1,001–5,0001,001–5,000
FundingSeries ESeries B
Best forIndividuals and teams from small groups up to large organizations scaling cross-functional work across departments.Enterprises that want AI agents and work management under governed controls at scale

Plans side by side

Asana

Personal$0free forever
Starter$10.99per user per month, billed annually
Advanced$24.99per user per month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Asana pricing

Wrike

Free$0user/month
Team$10user/month
Business$25user/month
PinnacleCustomcustom pricing
ApexCustomcustom pricing
Wrike pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Asana

  • Strong for cross-functional structured execution and milestone tracking
  • Easy to adopt and use, with clean design
  • Goal tracking and cross-team accountability
  • Strongest general-purpose project management choice
  • Asana Intelligence summarises status and spots bottlenecks; AI agents for coordination

    Wrike

    • Multi-department project tracking, time tracking, and customizable workflows
    • Request forms, proofing, workload planning, and approvals for creative agencies
    • Portfolio controls and risk management for large organizations
    • Enterprise-scale planning and reporting
    • Managing several complex projects with resource allocation and PMO governance

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Asana vs Wrike”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/asana-vs-wrike, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.