CodacyCode Quality & Security for AI-Assisted Engineering
vs
LookerAgentic business intelligence and embedded analytics on Google Cloud
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3
Codacy vs Looker
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Looker is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 8.3 versus 0.4 for Codacy.
Choose Codacy if…
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 (cloud infrastructure) coverage
Choose Looker if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (8.3 vs 0.4)
- AI answers describe it more positively (30% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 2 or ISO 27001 or FedRAMP or HIPAA coverage
- Governed semantic layer and metric consistency
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Codacy | Looker |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.4% | 8.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #35 | #11 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 3.2% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 17 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 30% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Codacy 0pp · Looker 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Looker leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CodacyLooker
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Codacy ranked higher
0Looker ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Codacy | Looker |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $18 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted | Google Cloud |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2 (cloud infrastructure) | SOC 2, ISO 27001, FedRAMP, HIPAA |
| Support | Standard support via email and in-app chat, Priority support via screen sharing and video chat, Dedicated Customer Success Manager and Solutions Engineer on Business plan | — |
| Founded | 2012 | — |
| Headquarters | Lisbon, Portugal | — |
| Employees | 51–200 | — |
| Funding | Series B · $28M raised | Series E · $280M raised |
| Best for | Fast-paced engineering teams building fast-growing codebases | — |
Plans side by side
Codacy
Developer$0per dev/mth, free forever
Team$18per dev/mth, yearly billing (from $21 monthly)
BusinessCustomcustom, per dev/mth, billed annually
Looker
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Codacy
Profile in progress.
Looker
- Governed semantic layer and metric consistency
- Strong integration with Google Cloud, BigQuery and Workspace
- Developer-centric data modeling via LookML
- Around 4.5 out of 5 stars on Gartner Peer Insights
- Quote-only enterprise pricing starting above $60,000 a year
- Poor fit for NoSQL-heavy data stacks or standalone embedded needs
- Less suited to teams using macOS without virtual machines
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Codacy vs Looker”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/codacy-vs-looker, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.