CodacyCode Quality & Security for AI-Assisted Engineering
vs
WarpOpen infrastructure for cloud software factories
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3
Codacy vs Warp
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Warp is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 1.2 versus 0.4 for Codacy.
Choose Codacy if…
- You want a lower entry price ($18 vs $20)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 (cloud infrastructure) coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose Warp if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.2 vs 0.4)
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Codacy | Warp |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.4% | 1.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #35 | #25 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 100% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Codacy 0pp · Warp 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Warp leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CodacyWarp
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Codacy ranked higher
0Warp ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Codacy | Warp |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $18 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $20 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted | Desktop apps plus Warp's cloud, with an option to self-host in your own VPC |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2 (cloud infrastructure) | SOC 2 Type 2 |
| Support | Standard support via email and in-app chat, Priority support via screen sharing and video chat, Dedicated Customer Success Manager and Solutions Engineer on Business plan | Private email support, Dedicated account manager and shared Slack channel (Enterprise), White-glove onboarding (Enterprise) |
| Founded | 2012 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Lisbon, Portugal | New York, NY |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series B · $28M raised | Seed · $73M raised |
| Best for | Fast-paced engineering teams building fast-growing codebases | Engineering teams that run AI coding agents across the terminal and cloud and want control over models and infrastructure. |
Plans side by side
Codacy
Developer$0per dev/mth, free forever
Team$18per dev/mth, yearly billing (from $21 monthly)
BusinessCustomcustom, per dev/mth, billed annually
Warp
Free$0month
Build$20month
Max$200month
Business$50per user per month, up to 25 seats
EnterpriseCustomcustom, contact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Codacy
Profile in progress.
Warp
- best for power users
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Codacy vs Warp”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/codacy-vs-warp, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.