CodemagicOne tool for all your mobile app builds.
vs
DockerRun AI agents and containers safely, anywhere.
Comparison · CI/CD · weekly run Nov 3
Codemagic vs Docker
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Docker is the stronger AI pick in CI/CD: it has a visibility score of 17.2 versus 0.9 for Codemagic.
Choose Codemagic if…
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
Choose Docker if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (17.2 vs 0.9)
- You want a lower entry price ($11 vs $3,990)
- AI answers describe it more positively (6% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 attestation for Docker Hub and Scout or ISO 27001 certification or ISO 27701 certified privacy program coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Codemagic | Docker |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.9% | 17.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in CI/CD | #28 | #7 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 4.5% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 27 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 6% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Codemagic 0pp · Docker 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Docker leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CodemagicDocker
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Codemagic ranked higher
0Docker ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Codemagic | Docker |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $3,990 / mo | Free; paid from $11 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted and fully maintained; dedicated servers optional, hosted in your region | Local and Docker-managed cloud |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2 | SOC 2 Type 2 attestation for Docker Hub and Scout, ISO 27001 certification, ISO 27701 certified privacy program |
| Support | Community support, Technical support, Priority support (enterprise), Free onboarding assistance | Community forums and Community Slack, Support tickets with 5, 2 or 1 business day response SLAs by plan, Premium Support and TAM add-on with 24x7 response |
| Founded | 2012 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 11–50 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Seed | Funding round |
| Best for | Teams building Flutter, React Native, native Android and iOS apps who want hosted mobile CI/CD. | Individual developers, growing teams and large enterprises that run AI coding agents and need security teams to govern them |
Plans side by side
Docker
Docker Personal$0per user/month
Docker Pro$11per user/month
Docker Team$16per user/month
Docker Business$24per user/month
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Codemagic
Profile in progress.
Docker
- Broad support for Docker and Kubernetes workflows
- Reliable for containerized, Docker-based workflows
- Docker layer caching
- Extra storage fees for Docker layers and images
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Codemagic vs Docker”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/codemagic-vs-docker, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.