CodemagicOne tool for all your mobile app builds.
vs
HarnessAI Platform for the Autonomous SDLC
Comparison · CI/CD · weekly run Nov 3
Codemagic vs Harness
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Harness is the stronger AI pick in CI/CD: it has a visibility score of 12.3 versus 0.9 for Codemagic.
Choose Codemagic if…
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose Harness if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (12.3 vs 0.9)
- AI answers describe it more positively (52% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 1 Type II or SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or FedRAMP 20x Class A or GDPR coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Codemagic | Harness |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.9% | 12.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in CI/CD | #28 | #11 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 3.7% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 23 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 52% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Codemagic 0pp · Harness 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Harness leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CodemagicHarness
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Codemagic ranked higher
0Harness ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Codemagic | Harness |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $3,990 / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted and fully maintained; dedicated servers optional, hosted in your region | Harness platform with a Harness Delegate that runs inside the customer's VPC or cluster; a self-managed platform is available as an Enterprise add-on. |
| Integrations | — | 40+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2 | SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, FedRAMP 20x Class A, GDPR |
| Support | Community support, Technical support, Priority support (enterprise), Free onboarding assistance | Standard support with a dedicated customer success manager (Essentials), Premier support and dedicated account manager (Enterprise), Community support (Free plan), Professional Services as an add-on |
| Founded | 2012 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 11–50 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Seed | Series E · $570M raised |
| Best for | Teams building Flutter, React Native, native Android and iOS apps who want hosted mobile CI/CD. | Enterprise engineering and platform teams that want CI, CD, security and cost controls on one governed platform. |
Plans side by side
Harness
Free Plan$0not stated
Essentials PlanCustomnot stated
Enterprise PlanCustomnot stated
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Codemagic
Profile in progress.
Harness
- Strong enterprise release governance
- Deployment safety and automated rollback
- Deployment verification and progressive delivery
- AI-driven pipeline optimization
- Analyst recognition as a strong continuous delivery vendor
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Codemagic vs Harness”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/codemagic-vs-harness, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.