Skip to content
SlateIndex
CodemagicOne tool for all your mobile app builds.
vs
HarnessAI Platform for the Autonomous SDLC
Comparison · CI/CD · weekly run Nov 3

Codemagic vs Harness

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Harness is the stronger AI pick in CI/CD: it has a visibility score of 12.3 versus 0.9 for Codemagic.

Choose Codemagic if…

  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
  • Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers

Choose Harness if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (12.3 vs 0.9)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (52% vs 0% positive)
  • You need SOC 1 Type II or SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or FedRAMP 20x Class A or GDPR coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Codemagic Harness
Visibility score0.9%12.3%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in CI/CD#28#11
Share of voice0.2%3.7%
Mentions this run123
Positive in AI answers0%52%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Codemagic 1%

Codemagic 0pp · Harness 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Harness leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0%
16.9%
AI Mode
0%
6.1%
Perplexity
2.6%
13.9%
CodemagicHarness

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0Codemagic ranked higher
0Harness ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionCodemagicHarness
Pricing modelUsage-basedFlat tiers
Entry priceFree; paid from $3,990 / moContact sales
Free planYesYes
DeploymentCloud-hosted and fully maintained; dedicated servers optional, hosted in your regionHarness platform with a Harness Delegate that runs inside the customer's VPC or cluster; a self-managed platform is available as an Enterprise add-on.
Integrations—40+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type 2SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, FedRAMP 20x Class A, GDPR
SupportCommunity support, Technical support, Priority support (enterprise), Free onboarding assistanceStandard support with a dedicated customer success manager (Essentials), Premier support and dedicated account manager (Enterprise), Community support (Free plan), Professional Services as an add-on
Founded20122017
HeadquartersLondon, United KingdomSan Francisco, California, United States
Employees11–501,001–5,000
FundingSeedSeries E · $570M raised
Best forTeams building Flutter, React Native, native Android and iOS apps who want hosted mobile CI/CD.Enterprise engineering and platform teams that want CI, CD, security and cost controls on one governed platform.

Plans side by side

Codemagic

Free$0month
Pay as you go$0month
Fixed price$3,990year
Enterprise$12,000year
Codemagic pricing

Harness

Free Plan$0not stated
Essentials PlanCustomnot stated
Enterprise PlanCustomnot stated
Harness pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Codemagic

Profile in progress.

Harness

  • Strong enterprise release governance
  • Deployment safety and automated rollback
  • Deployment verification and progressive delivery
  • AI-driven pipeline optimization
  • Analyst recognition as a strong continuous delivery vendor

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Codemagic vs Harness”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/codemagic-vs-harness, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.