CodeRabbitGovernance & Control for Agentic Development
vs
DevinThe autonomous software engineer
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3
CodeRabbit vs Devin
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Devin is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 16.9 versus 1.2 for CodeRabbit.
Choose CodeRabbit if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 12% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or GDPR coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose Devin if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (16.9 vs 1.2)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 coverage
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | CodeRabbit | Devin |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.2% | 16.9% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #24 | #5 |
| Share of voice | 0.6% | 6.1% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 29 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 12% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
CodeRabbit 0pp · Devin 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Devin leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CodeRabbitDevin
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0CodeRabbit ranked higher
0Devin ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | CodeRabbit | Devin |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $24 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $20 / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | Yes |
| Deployment | SaaS; self-hosting and company-selected SaaS regions available on Enterprise | Cloud agent at app.devin.ai and a local CLI, with dedicated VPC deployment on Enterprise plans |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 |
| Support | Enterprise plan: support SLA, dedicated customer success, and technical enablement | Priority support on Team plan, Dedicated Slack Connect channel for support, Dedicated account and engineering support on Enterprise plan, Optional onboarding call |
| Founded | 2023 | — |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA | San Francisco |
| Employees | 201–500 | — |
| Funding | Series C · $200M raised | Series E · $3700M raised |
| Best for | Engineering teams merging high volumes of pull requests, including AI-generated code from coding agents | Engineering teams that want to hand well-scoped coding, testing and maintenance tasks to parallel AI agents |
Plans side by side
CodeRabbit
Essentials$24per user/mo, billed annually
Team$48per user/mo, billed annually
Advanced$72per user/mo, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing, contact sales
Devin
Free$0month
Pro$20month
Max$200month
Teams$80month for team plan, plus $40/mo per full dev seat
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
CodeRabbit
Profile in progress.
Devin
- Robust free tier with unlimited autocomplete
- Best value agentic editor
- Fully autonomous software engineering
- Acts as a collaborative partner with parallel flows and self-correction
- Multi-file edits and deep context across large directories
- Fit depends on governance and workflow requirements
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “CodeRabbit vs Devin”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/coderabbit-vs-devin, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.