Skip to content
SlateIndex
CodexAI Coding Assistants
vs
DevinThe autonomous software engineer
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3

Codex vs Devin

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Codex is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 20.9 versus 16.9 for Devin, and ranks ahead in 93% of the answers that name both.

Choose Codex if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (20.9 vs 16.9)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (64% vs 12% positive)
  • Strong for autonomous coding tasks
  • Frequently included in top AI coding shortlists

Choose Devin if…

  • You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 coverage
  • Robust free tier with unlimited autocomplete
  • Best value agentic editor
  • Fully autonomous software engineering

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Codex Devin
Visibility score20.9%16.9%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in AI Coding Assistants#4#5
Share of voice5.4%6.1%
Mentions this run2829
Positive in AI answers64%12%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Codex 21%

Codex 0pp · Devin 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Codex leads on 2 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
35.6%
18.1%
AI Mode
10.4%
23.1%
Perplexity
16.9%
9.4%
CodexDevin

Head to head in AI answers

14 engine answers name both brands

13Codex ranked higher
1Devin ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionCodexDevin
Pricing model—Flat tiers
Entry price—Free; paid from $20 / mo
Free plan—Yes
DeploymentCloud-hosted agent, with local CLI, IDE extension and desktop app surfaces.Cloud agent at app.devin.ai and a local CLI, with dedicated VPC deployment on Enterprise plans
Compliance—SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001
Support—Priority support on Team plan, Dedicated Slack Connect channel for support, Dedicated account and engineering support on Enterprise plan, Optional onboarding call
Founded2025—
Headquarters—San Francisco
Funding—Series E · $3700M raised
Best forSoftware engineers who want an AI agent to handle coding tasks such as writing code and fixing bugs.Engineering teams that want to hand well-scoped coding, testing and maintenance tasks to parallel AI agents

Plans side by side

Codex

Pricing not available.

Devin

Free$0month
Pro$20month
Max$200month
Teams$80month for team plan, plus $40/mo per full dev seat
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Devin pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Codex

  • Strong for autonomous coding tasks
  • Frequently included in top AI coding shortlists
  • Enterprise-scale engineering adoption
  • Deterministic multi-step task execution for OpenAI-first teams
  • Delegated engineering tasks, code review, and cloud or parallel agent workflows
  • Appears less consistently in enterprise analyst lists

Devin

  • Robust free tier with unlimited autocomplete
  • Best value agentic editor
  • Fully autonomous software engineering
  • Acts as a collaborative partner with parallel flows and self-correction
  • Multi-file edits and deep context across large directories
  • Fit depends on governance and workflow requirements

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Codex vs Devin”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/codex-vs-devin, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.