CodexAI Coding Assistants
vs
ZedThe world's fastest IDE. Open source. AI optional.
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3
Codex vs Zed
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Codex is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 20.9 versus 1 for Zed, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Codex if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (20.9 vs 1)
- AI answers describe it more positively (64% vs 50% positive)
- Strong for autonomous coding tasks
- Frequently included in top AI coding shortlists
Choose Zed if…
- Ideal for small teams already on GitHub
- Works with VS Code and JetBrains
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Codex | Zed |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 20.9% | 1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #4 | #26 |
| Share of voice | 5.4% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 28 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 64% | 50% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Codex 0pp · Zed 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Codex leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CodexZed
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
1Codex ranked higher
0Zed ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Codex | Zed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official website of the top AI coding assistant vendors | ChatGPT | #2 | #16 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Codex | Zed |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $10 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted agent, with local CLI, IDE extension and desktop app surfaces. | Desktop editor on Windows, macOS and Linux, with remote development over SSH, WSL and dev containers. Users can run local Ollama models, and API keys for hosted providers are kept on the local machine. |
| Founded | 2025 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | — | Boulder, Colorado |
| Employees | — | 11–50 |
| Funding | — | Series B · $42M raised |
| Best for | Software engineers who want an AI agent to handle coding tasks such as writing code and fixing bugs. | Developers who want a fast editor with AI optional, and teams that need org-level control over AI features and data sharing through the Business plan. |
Plans side by side
Codex
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Codex
- Strong for autonomous coding tasks
- Frequently included in top AI coding shortlists
- Enterprise-scale engineering adoption
- Deterministic multi-step task execution for OpenAI-first teams
- Delegated engineering tasks, code review, and cloud or parallel agent workflows
- Appears less consistently in enterprise analyst lists
Zed
- Ideal for small teams already on GitHub
- Works with VS Code and JetBrains
- Heavy usage requires a paid plan upgrade
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Codex vs Zed”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/codex-vs-zed, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.