Skip to content
SlateIndex
ConnecteamOne app. One place. One way of working.
vs
CYPHER LearningTurn training into performance with an AI-native training platform
Comparison · Learning Management · weekly run Nov 3

Connecteam vs CYPHER Learning

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

CYPHER Learning is the stronger AI pick in Learning Management: it has a visibility score of 2.5 versus 0.9 for Connecteam.

Choose Connecteam if…

  • You want a free plan to start
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
  • Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
  • Free plan for up to 10 users

Choose CYPHER Learning if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.5 vs 0.9)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 35% positive)
  • Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
  • Built for enterprise and corporate training tracking

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Connecteam CYPHER Learning
Visibility score0.9%2.5%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Learning Management#43#27
Share of voice0.2%1.1%
Mentions this run14
Positive in AI answers35%50%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Connecteam 1%

Connecteam 0pp · CYPHER Learning 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

CYPHER Learning leads on 2 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0%
0.9%
AI Mode
0%
6.5%
Perplexity
2.6%
0%
ConnecteamCYPHER Learning

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0Connecteam ranked higher
0CYPHER Learning ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionConnecteamCYPHER Learning
Pricing modelPer seatFlat tiers
Entry priceFree; paid from $29 per seat / moContact sales
Free planYesNo
Integrations—1000+
Support24/7 live support via live chat and email, Dedicated success manager and implementation expert24/7 AI support, 24/7 ticket submission, Online knowledge base, Built-in learner help desk
Founded—2009
HeadquartersNew York City, NY, United StatesPlano, Texas
Employees201–50051–200
FundingSeries C · $220M raisedGrowth equity led by Invictus Growth Partners · $40M raised
Best forFrontline and deskless teams, from small teams to global enterprisesOrganizations that must train distributed audiences at scale, including employees, partners, customers, agents, dealers, franchise networks and training companies.

Plans side by side

Connecteam

Basic$29per month, first 30 users (Operations hub)
Advanced$49per month, first 30 users (Operations hub)
Expert$99per month, first 30 users (Operations hub)
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing, contact sales
Small Business$0free for life, up to 10 users
Connecteam pricing

CYPHER Learning

EnhancedCustomcustom pricing, contact sales
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing, contact sales
CYPHER Learning pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Connecteam

  • Free plan for up to 10 users
  • Streamlined mobile-first time tracking and task management
  • 14-day free trial
  • Transparent, scalable, budget-friendly pricing
  • Strong scheduling, GPS time tracking and workforce coordination

    CYPHER Learning

    • Built for enterprise and corporate training tracking
    • Competency-based and automated course creation
    • AI-native skill lifecycle management

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Connecteam vs CYPHER Learning”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/connecteam-vs-cypher-learning, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.