ContentsquareAI-first experience platform for every human and agent journey
vs
HockeyStackThe Command Center for B2B Revenue Teams.
Comparison · Web Analytics · weekly run Nov 2
Contentsquare vs HockeyStack
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Contentsquare is the stronger AI pick in Web Analytics: it has a visibility score of 6.7 versus 2.1 for HockeyStack.
Choose Contentsquare if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (6.7 vs 2.1)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO/IEC 27701 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 9001:2015 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Automatic event capture (autocapture) with no manual tagging
Choose HockeyStack if…
- Connects marketing touchpoints to product usage, revenue, and churn data
- Built specifically for B2B SaaS
- Does not require a large data engineering team
- Suited to connecting campaigns to pipeline and closed-won revenue
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Contentsquare | HockeyStack |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 6.7% | 2.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Web Analytics | #14 | #25 |
| Share of voice | 2.5% | 0.6% |
| Mentions this run | 13 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Contentsquare 0pp · HockeyStack 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Contentsquare leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ContentsquareHockeyStack
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Contentsquare ranked higher
0HockeyStack ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Contentsquare | HockeyStack |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $49 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Integrations | 115+ | — |
| Compliance | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO/IEC 27701, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 9001:2015 | — |
| Support | AI-powered support on the Free plan, Priority support on Pro and Enterprise, Dedicated support and SLAs on Enterprise, Dedicated customer success manager on Enterprise | Hands-on support from the customer success team |
| Founded | 2012 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Paris, France | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series F | Round announced April 2026 · $50M raised |
| Best for | Digital teams at large enterprise and mid-market brands that want to understand and improve journeys across web and apps. The Free plan suits first-time users, and Enterprise suits large teams. | Marketing leaders, GTM operations and sales leaders at B2B companies that need one view of pipeline across marketing and sales data |
Plans side by side
Contentsquare
Free$0forever (up to 200k monthly sessions)
Growth$49month (from 7k monthly sessions; $39/month billed yearly)
ProCustomcustom
EnterpriseCustomcustom
HockeyStack
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Contentsquare
- Automatic event capture (autocapture) with no manual tagging
- Session replay and UX friction insights
- Strong G2 rating from many reviews
- Recognised market leader in digital experience analytics
- Free tier available for small projects
- Paid plans require custom quotes rather than transparent pricing
HockeyStack
- Connects marketing touchpoints to product usage, revenue, and churn data
- Built specifically for B2B SaaS
- Does not require a large data engineering team
- Suited to connecting campaigns to pipeline and closed-won revenue
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Contentsquare vs HockeyStack”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/contentsquare-vs-hockeystack, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.