CursorAI Coding Agent for Building Ambitious Software
vs
DeepSourceYour green light to ship with confidence.
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3
Cursor vs DeepSource
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Cursor is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 67.7 versus 0 for DeepSource.
Choose Cursor if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (67.7 vs 0)
- You need AIUC-1 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 coverage
- Strong codebase indexing and multi-file editing
- High user satisfaction and momentum
Choose DeepSource if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need GDPR coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Cursor | DeepSource |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 67.7% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #2 | #40 |
| Share of voice | 13.6% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 65 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | 53% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Cursor 0pp · DeepSource 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Cursor leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CursorDeepSource
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Cursor ranked higher
0DeepSource ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Cursor | DeepSource |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $24 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Desktop, CLI, web, mobile and cloud agents | Cloud; self-hosted deployment available on the Enterprise plan |
| Compliance | AIUC-1, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, SOC 2 Type II | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR |
| Support | Customer support by email at hi@cursor.com, Priority support on the Enterprise plan | Priority support on the Team plan, Priority support with SLA on the Enterprise plan, Dedicated account manager on the Enterprise plan |
| Founded | — | 2018 |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | — |
| Funding | Funding round at $9.9B valuation | Pre-seed |
| Best for | Individual developers and engineering teams that hand coding tasks to AI agents, and larger organizations that need enterprise security and admin controls. | Engineering teams, from startups to Fortune 500s, that want code review on pull requests covering security and code quality. |
Plans side by side
Cursor
Pricing not available.
DeepSource
Open SourceCustom
Team$24user/month, billed yearly
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Cursor
- Strong codebase indexing and multi-file editing
- High user satisfaction and momentum
- Top overall pick for professional developers
- Transparent pricing tiers and annual discount
- Free tier to try it
- Shared credit pool makes heavy agentic usage less predictable
- Free Hobby plan has limited usage
DeepSource
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Cursor vs DeepSource”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cursor-vs-deepsource, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.