Skip to content
SlateIndex
CursorAI Coding Agent for Building Ambitious Software
vs
GraphiteCode review for the age of AI
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3

Cursor vs Graphite

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Cursor is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 67.7 versus 0 for Graphite.

Choose Cursor if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (67.7 vs 0)
  • You need AIUC-1 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or SOC 2 Type II coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
  • Strong codebase indexing and multi-file editing

Choose Graphite if…

No clear advantage in the published data.

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Cursor Graphite
Visibility score67.7%0%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in AI Coding Assistants#2#41
Share of voice13.6%0%
Mentions this run650
Positive in AI answers53%—

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Cursor 68%

Cursor 0pp · Graphite 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Cursor leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
78.7%
0%
AI Mode
73.5%
0%
Perplexity
50.9%
0%
CursorGraphite

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0Cursor ranked higher
0Graphite ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionCursorGraphite
Pricing model—Per seat
Entry price—Free; paid from $20 per seat / mo
Free plan—Yes
DeploymentDesktop, CLI, web, mobile and cloud agents—
ComplianceAIUC-1, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, SOC 2 Type II—
SupportCustomer support by email at hi@cursor.com, Priority support on the Enterprise planPremium support and SLAs on Enterprise plan, Contact team via pricing FAQ
Founded—2020
Headquarters—New York City, NY, US
Employees501–1,00051–200
FundingFunding round at $9.9B valuationSeries B · $81M raised
Best forIndividual developers and engineering teams that hand coding tasks to AI agents, and larger organizations that need enterprise security and admin controls.Engineering teams on GitHub that want to speed up review cycles and improve code quality with AI.

Plans side by side

Cursor

Pricing not available.

Graphite

Hobby$0Free
Starter$20Per user/month, billed annually
Team$40Per user/month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomCustom
Graphite pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Cursor

  • Strong codebase indexing and multi-file editing
  • High user satisfaction and momentum
  • Top overall pick for professional developers
  • Transparent pricing tiers and annual discount
  • Free tier to try it
  • Shared credit pool makes heavy agentic usage less predictable
  • Free Hobby plan has limited usage

Graphite

Profile in progress.

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Cursor vs Graphite”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cursor-vs-graphite, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.