CursorAI Coding Agent for Building Ambitious Software
vs
JulesAsynchronous coding agent that works on GitHub repositories
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3
Cursor vs Jules
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Cursor is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 67.7 versus 0 for Jules.
Choose Cursor if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (67.7 vs 0)
- You need AIUC-1 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or SOC 2 Type II coverage
- Strong codebase indexing and multi-file editing
- High user satisfaction and momentum
Choose Jules if…
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Cursor | Jules |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 67.7% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #2 | #43 |
| Share of voice | 13.6% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 65 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | 53% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Cursor 0pp · Jules 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Cursor leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CursorJules
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Cursor ranked higher
0Jules ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Cursor | Jules |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Desktop, CLI, web, mobile and cloud agents | Cloud-hosted: each task runs in a secure Google Cloud virtual machine |
| Compliance | AIUC-1, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, SOC 2 Type II | — |
| Support | Customer support by email at hi@cursor.com, Priority support on the Enterprise plan | — |
| Headquarters | — | Mountain View, California |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 5,000+ |
| Funding | Funding round at $9.9B valuation | — |
| Best for | Individual developers and engineering teams that hand coding tasks to AI agents, and larger organizations that need enterprise security and admin controls. | Developers on GitHub who want routine tasks such as bug fixes, tests and version bumps handled asynchronously |
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Cursor
- Strong codebase indexing and multi-file editing
- High user satisfaction and momentum
- Top overall pick for professional developers
- Transparent pricing tiers and annual discount
- Free tier to try it
- Shared credit pool makes heavy agentic usage less predictable
- Free Hobby plan has limited usage
Jules
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Cursor vs Jules”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cursor-vs-jules, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.