Cursor vs Roo Code

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Cursor is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 67.7 versus 0 for Roo Code.

You want the brand AI engines rank higher (67.7 vs 0)
You need AIUC-1 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or SOC 2 Type II coverage
Strong codebase indexing and multi-file editing
High user satisfaction and momentum

No clear advantage in the published data.

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

Cursor 0pp · Roo Code 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Cursor leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT

78.7%

AI Mode

73.5%

Perplexity

50.9%

CursorRoo Code

0 engine answers name both brands

0Cursor ranked higher

0Roo Code ranked higher

Dimension	Cursor	Roo Code
Deployment	Desktop, CLI, web, mobile and cloud agents	Self-hosted on your own infrastructure or as an isolated single-tenant deployment
Compliance	AIUC-1, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, SOC 2 Type II	—
Support	Customer support by email at hi@cursor.com, Priority support on the Enterprise plan	—
Headquarters	—	San Rafael, CA
Employees	501–1,000	—
Funding	Funding round at $9.9B valuation	Seed
Best for	Individual developers and engineering teams that hand coding tasks to AI agents, and larger organizations that need enterprise security and admin controls.	Engineering teams that want autonomous coding with source, prompts and workflow kept visible and under their control, and individual developers who want a cloud agent they own