CyberArkUnified IAM, PAM, and IGA identity security platform.
vs
FronteggCIAM for B2B SaaS and identity for AI agents
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3
CyberArk vs Frontegg
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
CyberArk is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 15.6 versus 1.3 for Frontegg.
Choose CyberArk if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (15.6 vs 1.3)
- AI answers describe it more positively (49% vs 40% positive)
- You need SOC 2 or SOC 3 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017:2015 or ISO/IEC 27018:2019 or ISO 9001:2015 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO 22301 or CSA STAR or Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus or FedRAMP High or Common Criteria or PCI DSS v4.0.1 or HIPAA or IRAP or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
Choose Frontegg if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or CSA STAR Level 1 coverage
- Named as best embedded multi-tenant platform
- Ready-made embeddable admin portals and self-service tools
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | CyberArk | Frontegg |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 15.6% | 1.3% |
| Change vs last week | up+2.1% | down−0.2% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #7 | #28 |
| Share of voice | 6.1% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 19 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 49% | 40% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
CyberArk +0.5pp · Frontegg −0.5999999999999999pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
CyberArk leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CyberArkFrontegg
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0CyberArk ranked higher
0Frontegg ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | CyberArk | Frontegg |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Usage-based |
| Entry price | — | Contact sales |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Self-hosted and SaaS | Cloud (multi-region), with private deployments on Enterprise |
| Compliance | SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, ISO 9001:2015, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO 22301, CSA STAR, Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus, FedRAMP High, Common Criteria, PCI DSS v4.0.1, HIPAA, IRAP, GDPR, CCPA | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, CSA STAR Level 1 |
| Support | Support contact, Knowledge base, Technical community | Community support, Email support, Dedicated Slack channel, Premium support |
| Founded | 1999 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Newton, MA, United States | Mountain View, California, United States |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Post-IPO debt | Series B · $70M raised |
| Best for | Enterprises that need to secure privileged access for human and machine identities. | B2B SaaS companies that need enterprise-ready, multi-tenant customer identity without building it in-house |
Plans side by side
CyberArk
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
CyberArk
- Market leader in privileged access management (PAM)
- Strong identity security and credential risk mitigation
- Security-first approach with strong behavioral analytics
- Bridges standard access management with robust PAM and machine identity security
- Strong for enterprises combining workforce identity with PAM
Frontegg
- Named as best embedded multi-tenant platform
- Ready-made embeddable admin portals and self-service tools
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “CyberArk vs Frontegg”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cyberark-vs-frontegg, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.