CyberArk vs Okta
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Okta is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 56.9 versus 15.6 for CyberArk, and ranks ahead in 97% of the answers that name both.
Choose CyberArk if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (49% vs 39% positive)
- You need SOC 2 or SOC 3 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017:2015 or ISO/IEC 27018:2019 or ISO 9001:2015 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO 22301 or CSA STAR or Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus or Common Criteria or PCI DSS v4.0.1 or HIPAA or IRAP or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- Market leader in privileged access management (PAM)
- Strong identity security and credential risk mitigation
Choose Okta if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (56.9 vs 15.6)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or SOC 2 Type II or FedRAMP Moderate or FIPS 140-2 or DoD Impact Level 4 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
- Market-leading IAM platform
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | CyberArk | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 15.6% | 56.9% |
| Change vs last week | up+2.1% | down−0.9% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #7 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 6.1% | 12.2% |
| Mentions this run | 19 | 38 |
| Positive in AI answers | 49% | 39% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
CyberArk +0.5pp · Okta −3.3000000000000043pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Okta leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
31 engine answers name both brands
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | CyberArk | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | $6 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | No · 30-day trial |
| Deployment | Self-hosted and SaaS | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Integrations | — | 8000+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, ISO 9001:2015, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO 22301, CSA STAR, Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus, FedRAMP High, Common Criteria, PCI DSS v4.0.1, HIPAA, IRAP, GDPR, CCPA | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP High, FedRAMP Moderate, FIPS 140-2, DoD Impact Level 4 |
| Support | Support contact, Knowledge base, Technical community | Online support (24x5), Knowledge base, Community forum, Premier Success Plans |
| Founded | 1999 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Newton, MA, United States | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 5,000+ |
| Funding | Post-IPO debt | IPO |
| Best for | Enterprises that need to secure privileged access for human and machine identities. | Organizations that need to secure workforce, customer, partner and AI agent identities from one cloud identity platform. |
Plans side by side
CyberArk
Pricing not available.
Okta
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
CyberArk
- Market leader in privileged access management (PAM)
- Strong identity security and credential risk mitigation
- Security-first approach with strong behavioral analytics
- Bridges standard access management with robust PAM and machine identity security
- Strong for enterprises combining workforce identity with PAM
Okta
- Market-leading IAM platform
- Independent, cloud-native identity platform
- Broad SaaS integrations with SSO and MFA
- Top overall enterprise IAM recommendation
- Strong security effectiveness
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “CyberArk vs Okta”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cyberark-vs-okta, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.